Background: Event-driven dosing of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) using a 2-1-1 regimen is efficacious for men who have sex with men (MSM). However, data are limited on the prevalence, correlates, and patterns of nondaily PrEP use in the United States.
Setting: Nationwide online survey.
Methods: We distributed a survey to assess experiences with PrEP, including nondaily use, in May 2019 on geosocial networking sites commonly used by MSM.
Results: Among 9697 respondents, the mean age was 43 years, 67% were non-Hispanic white, and 90% were MSM. Nearly all (91.0%) had heard of PrEP, 40.1% ever used PrEP, and 33.3% used PrEP in the past 6 months. Most (60.6%) were interested in nondaily PrEP. Those without health insurance and those with higher incomes were more likely to be interested in nondaily PrEP. Of the 3232 who used PrEP in the past 6 months, 176 (5.4%) reported nondaily use. Fewer sexual partners, frequent sex planning, and substance use were associated with nondaily use. Common reasons for nondaily use were inconsistent sexual activity (59%) and cost (49%). The most prevalent regimen was event driven (48.3%); of those, 64.7% used 2-1-1. Of nondaily users, 24.0% used PrEP on a regular schedule but not every day, including only on weekends or days starting with T or S.
Conclusions: Given substantial interest in nondaily PrEP, and use of nondaily strategies that have not been evaluated in clinical studies, there is a need for US public health authorities to provide guidance on safe and effective nondaily dosing for MSM.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228850 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000002332 | DOI Listing |
BMC Public Health
December 2024
Institute for Mental Health Policy Research & Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Background: Although some evidence suggests that alcohol, substance use, and mental health issues diminish adherence to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) among gay, bisexual, and other men-who-have-sex-with-men (gbMSM), findings are somewhat inconsistent and have primarily derived from studies involving non-random samples. Medical chart extraction can provide unique insight by in part surmounting sampling-related limitations, as data for entire PrEP clinic populations can be examined. Our investigation entailed comprehensive chart extraction to assess the extent to which chart-reported alcohol, substance use, and mental health issues were associated with chart-reported PrEP nonadherence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGlob Health Med
October 2024
Center for ViroScience and Cure, Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) impacts millions of individuals worldwide, and well over 2/3 of those living with HIV are accessing antiviral therapies that are successfully repressing viral replication. Most often, HIV treatments and prevention are administered in the form of daily pills as combinations of multiple drugs. An emergent and effective strategy for suppressing viral replication is the application of long-acting antiretroviral therapy (LAART), or antivirals that require less-frequent, non-daily doses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPharmaceutics
March 2024
Laboratory Branch, Division of HIV Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with a weekly oral regimen of antiretroviral drugs could be a suitable preventative option for individuals who struggle with daily PrEP or prefer not to use long-acting injectables. We assessed in macaques the efficacy of weekly oral tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) at doses of 13.7 or 27.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSex Health
August 2023
School of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond Street, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK.
Background: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is key to HIV transmission elimination but implementation is challenging and under-researched. We undertook a process evaluation of the first 2years of a national PrEP program to explore barriers and facilitators to implementation and to develop recommendations to improve implementation, focusing on PrEP uptake and initiation.
Methods: Stage 1 involved semi-structured telephone interviews and focus groups (September 2018-July 2019) with geographically and demographically diverse patients seeking/using/declining/stopping PrEP (n =39), sexual healthcare professionals (n =54), community-based organisation service users (n =9) and staff (n =15) across Scotland.
Background: Gay and bisexual men (GBM) who use HIV preexposure prophylaxis (HIV-PrEP) have high rates of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The use of daily antibiotics as STI preexposure prophylaxis (STI-PrEP) may be appealing to GBM who are using or have previously used HIV-PrEP (HIV-PrEP-experienced) for the prevention of bacterial STIs.
Methods: We examined willingness to use daily STI-PrEP among a cross-sectional sample of HIV-PrEP-experienced GBM in Australia who participated in an observational online cohort study from August 2018 to March 2020.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!