Review of: Rosenstock J, Perkovic V, Johansen, OE, et al. Effect of linagliptin vs placebo on major cardiovascular events in adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular and renal risk: the CARMELINA randomized clinical trial. . 2019;321:69-79. McGuire DK, Alexander JH, Johansen OE, et al. Linagliptin effects on heart failure and related outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular and renal risk in CARMELINA. . 2019;139:351-361. These two papers describe the findings from the CARMELINA trial (Cardiovascular and Renal Microvascular Outcome Study with Linagliptin): the first paper reported results for the primary cardiovascular composite outcome (cardiovascular [CV] death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], or nonfatal stroke; 3-point major adverse cardiovascular event [3P-MACE]) and the key secondary renal composite outcome (renal death, end-stage kidney disease, or sustained ≥40% decrease in eGFR from baseline); the second paper reported secondary analyses of heart failure (HF) and related outcomes. The CARMELINA trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter non-inferiority trial of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and elevated CV and renal risk. After a median 2.2-year follow-up of 6979 participants, patients allocated to linagliptin demonstrated no increase in the risk of 3P-MACE versus placebo: hazard ratio (HR) 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.17]; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There was also no increase in the risk of hospitalization for HF for linagliptin versus placebo (HR 0.90 [0.74-1.08]). There was no increased risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease or death due to kidney disease (HR 0.87 [0.69-1.10]). Additionally, progression of albuminuria occurred less frequently in patients who received linagliptin versus placebo (HR 0.86 [0.78-0.95]). Overall, no new safety findings were identified for linagliptin, and no increased risk of hypoglycemia was observed for linagliptin versus placebo. Together, these findings from the CARMELINA trial reaffirm treatment guidelines for choosing additional therapies for patients with T2DM at elevated CV and/or renal risk, and provide new information on the role of linagliptin in the management of T2DM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2020.1742524DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

type diabetes
16
cardiovascular renal
16
renal risk
12
cardiovascular
9
renal
8
johansen linagliptin
8
adults type
8
high cardiovascular
8
risk carmelina
8
heart failure
8

Similar Publications

Background: Type 1 diabetes is the most common endocrine health condition among youth. Healthcare professionals must consider evidence-based guidelines in managing children and adolescents with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The current study aims to assess the outcomes of implementing clinical guidelines by the American Diabetes Association to manage DKA among pediatrics in an emergency department in Palestine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

While recent studies suggested a potential causal link between type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) but not type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the involved mechanism remains unclear. Here, using a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, we verified the causal relationship between the two types of diabetes mellitus and IPF and investigated the possible role of inflammation in the association between diabetes mellitus and IPF. Based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data of T1DM, T2DM, and IPF, the univariable MR, multivariable MR (MVMR), and mediation MR were successively used to analyze the causal relationship.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To evaluate the accuracy of home self-monitoring portable blood glucose meters, we analyzed the current problems of patients using portable blood glucose meters and put forward reasonable suggestions. A self-designed questionnaire was used to survey 142 patients and 132 healthcare professionals. The questionnaire consisted of 16 items with an overall score ranging from 1 to 13 (with a higher score indicating better experience).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Digital technologies for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care hold great potential to improve patients' health in the long term. Only a subset of telemedicine offerings are digital interventions that meet the criteria for prescribable digitale Gesundheitsanwendung (digital health apps; DiGAs) in Germany. Digital treatments further provide vast amounts of patient data that are important to generate evidence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) significantly deteriorates patients' quality of life (QOL). This study examined the dynamic interplay of factors that influence QOL in patients with T2DM, utilizing concepts from positive psychology and intrinsic mechanisms, to lay the groundwork for improving patient outcomes. Improving self-management behaviors is essential for effective disease management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!