Purpose: Simple elbow dislocations are accompanied with lateral ulnar collateral ligament ruptures. For persisting instability, surgery is indicated to prevent chronic posterolateral rotatory instability. After lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex repair the repair is protected by temporary immobilization, limited range of motion and hinged bracing. Internal bracing is an operative alternative augmenting the LCL repair using non-absorbable suture tapes. However, the stability of LCL repair with and without additional augmentation remains unclear. The hypothesis was that LCL repair with additional suture tape augmentation would improve load to failure. Secondary goal of this study was to evaluate different humeral fixation techniques. A humeral fixation using separate anchors for the LCL repair and the augmentation was not expected to provide superior stability compared to using only one single anchor.
Methods: Twenty-one elbows were tested. A cyclic varus rotational torque of 0.5-3.5 Nm was applied in 90°, 60°, 30°, and 120° elbow flexion to the intact, torn, and repaired LCLs. The specimens were randomized into three groups: repair alone (group I), repair with additional internal bracing using two anchors (group II), repair using one humeral anchor (group III). A load-to-failure protocol was conducted.
Results: Load to failure was significantly higher in groups II (26.6 Nm; P = 0.017) and III (23.18 Nm; P = 0.038) than in group I (12.13 Nm). No significant difference was observed between group II and III. All specimens lost reduction after LCL dissection by a mean of 4.48° ± 4.99° (range 0.66-15.82). The mean reduction gain after repair was 7.21° ± 4.97° (2.70-21.23; mean over reduction, 2.73°). The laxity was comparable between the intact and repaired LCLs (n.s.), except for varus movements at 30° in group II (P = 0.035) and 30° (P = 0.001) and 120° in group III (P = 0.008) with significantly less laxity. Inserting the ulnar suture anchor showed failure in the thread in 10 cases.
Conclusion: LCL repair with additional internal bracing yielded higher load to failure than repair alone. Repair with additional internal bracing for the humeral side using one anchor was sufficient. A higher primary stability would facilitate postoperative management and allow immediate functional treatment. Reducing the number of humeral anchors would save costs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05918-5 | DOI Listing |
Arthroscopy
December 2024
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hsin Kuo Min Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address:
Purpose: To determine whether the fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperatively and assessed using the Goutallier fatty degeneration index (GFDI), can predict early postoperative shoulder stiffness (POSS) after rotator cuff repair (RCR).
Methods: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study included patients who underwent primary RCR, had available medical records, and underwent MRI before RCR between November 2012 and July 2022. Patients were excluded on the basis of the following criteria: (1) preoperative shoulder stiffness, (2) additional procedures (e.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Background: For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
November 2024
Sports Medicine Department, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, No. 31, Xin Jie Kou Dong Street, Xi Cheng District, Beijing 100035, P.R. China; Sports Medicine Department, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 31, Xin Jie Kou Dong Street, Xi Cheng District, Beijing 100035, P.R. China. Electronic address:
Background: Untreated lateral collateral ligament (LCL) lesions in recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis (RLE) may cause residual pain and progressed to elbow instability. However, there is not enough research on the effect of arthroscopic treatment of combined LCL degenerative lesions without instability in RLE patients. The purpose of this study was to 1) evaluate the clinical and radiological results of RLE patients with LCL degenerative lesions without instability who received arthroscopic LCL débridement and ECRB repair, and 2) compare clinical outcomes between RLE patients with LCL degenerative lesion and those without, which received ECRB repair alone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPhys Ther Sport
November 2024
Director of Physiotherapy, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK. Electronic address:
Objectives: Isolated rupture of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) of the knee is extremely rare in professional football, and there is a paucity of literature describing the rehabilitation for this injury. This case report demonstrates the use of a return-to-performance (RTP) pathway that is time-independent, has clear criteria, and progressive phases to help inform decisions made by a multidisciplinary team (MDT).
Methods: A 25-year-old professional footballer sustained an isolated LCL rupture following a tackle by an opposing player, forcing his knee into excessive varus motion.
J Orthop Case Rep
October 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Sancheti Institute of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!