In this report we use a case study of risk of (SUDEP) to illustrate the contribution of systematic literature reviews of disease-specific ethical issues (DSEI). In particular, we show how ethically-relevant empirical data from such reviews can be used in the examination of the reasons for and against a particular normative approach to our DSEI. That is, we have attempted to offer a normative recommendation in response to the question of whether or not the risk of SUDEP should be disclosed to all patients. This case study functions as a form of empirical bioethics by providing a means of assessing empirical claims underlying reasons. As a result of this process, we are then able to provide clear and transparent, if not definitive, justification for a normative recommendation in response to a question of interest.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2020.1737981 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!