Mitotic and pheromone-specific intrinsic polarization cues interfere with gradient sensing in .

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Department of Physiology, Molecular and Cellular Biology, School of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires (UBA), C1428EGA Buenos Aires, Argentina;

Published: March 2020

Polarity decisions are central to many processes, including mitosis and chemotropism. In , budding and mating projection (MP) formation use an overlapping system of cortical landmarks that converges on the small G protein Cdc42. However, pheromone-gradient sensing must override the Rsr1-dependent internal polarity cues used for budding. Using this model system, we asked what happens when intrinsic and extrinsic spatial cues are not aligned. Is there competition, or collaboration? By live-cell microscopy and microfluidics techniques, we uncovered three previously overlooked features of this signaling system. First, the cytokinesis-associated polarization patch serves as a polarity landmark independently of all known cues. Second, the Rax1-Rax2 complex functions as a pheromone-promoted polarity cue in the distal pole of the cells. Third, internal cues remain active during pheromone-gradient tracking and can interfere with this process, biasing the location of MPs. Yeast defective in internal-cue utilization align significantly better than wild type with artificially generated pheromone gradients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7104260PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912505117DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cues
5
mitotic pheromone-specific
4
pheromone-specific intrinsic
4
intrinsic polarization
4
polarization cues
4
cues interfere
4
interfere gradient
4
gradient sensing
4
polarity
4
sensing polarity
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!