Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To assess the effect of tooth preparation design on fracture resistance of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate overlays.
Materials And Methods: This study evaluated 50 human maxillary first molars with no caries, restorations or anatomical defects. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups (n = 10/group) based on preparation design for the fabrication of overlay restorations: (O) anatomical occlusal reduction, (OS) anatomical occlusal reduction with round shoulder preparation, (OG) anatomical occlusal reduction with a central groove, (OSG) anatomical occlusal reduction with round shoulder preparation and central groove, and (C) no preparation of tooth (control group). All restorations were fabricated using zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Vita Suprinity). The specimens underwent thermomechanical fatigue loading in a masticatory simulator (1.2 million cycles at 98 N). Fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was determined as well. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test, paired t-test and Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05).
Results: Group O showed significantly higher fracture resistance than groups OG and OSG (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). The fracture resistance of group OS was significantly higher than that of group OSG (p = 0.008). The fracture resistance of the control group was significantly higher than that of OG and OSG (p = 0.001) and had no significant difference with other groups.
Conclusions: Group O (anatomical occlusal reduction alone), which had the most conservative preparation design, yielded the highest fracture resistance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13160 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!