Survival of Primary Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Compared With Surgery for Operable Stage I/II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Ann Thorac Surg

Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address:

Published: July 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is often used for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its effectiveness for operable cases is uncertain; this study explored that by evaluating patients who chose SBRT over recommended surgery.* -
  • The analysis included data from the National Cancer Database, identifying 1,359 patients who opted for SBRT between 2004 and 2016, and found factors like age and race influenced this decision; a matching process was used for a fair comparison between SBRT and surgical patients.* -
  • Results showed that patients who underwent surgery had a significantly longer median survival (74 months) compared to those treated with SBRT (47 months),

Article Abstract

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an accepted primary treatment option for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The role of SBRT in the treatment of operable disease remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated patients with operable early-stage NSCLC who elected to receive primary SBRT, examined factors associated with SBRT, and compared overall survival after surgical resection and SBRT.

Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with stage I/II, N0 NSCLC from 2004 to 2016. The proportion of patients who refused recommended surgery and were treated with SBRT was calculated. A propensity score predicting the probability of refusing surgery and receiving SBRT was generated and used to match SBRT and resected patients. Long-term overall survival was compared in the matched cohort using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

Results: We identified 1359 patients (0.98%) who refused recommended surgery and elected SBRT. This proportion increased annually, from 0.1% in 2004 to 1.7% in 2016. Factors associated with SBRT were older age, black race, Medicaid coverage, lower T stage, and more recent diagnosis year. Propensity matching resulted in 1315 well-balanced pairs. Surgery was associated with higher median survival (74 vs 47 months, P < .01) in the matched cohort. Survival benefit persisted after adjusting for covariates on Cox regression (hazard ratio, 1.69; P < .01).

Conclusions: Median survival was significantly higher after surgery compared with SBRT in a risk-adjusted matched cohort of patients judged to be surgical candidates. Operable patients considering primary SBRT should be educated regarding this difference in survival.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405040PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.01.073DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

matched cohort
12
sbrt
11
stereotactic body
8
body radiation
8
radiation therapy
8
stage i/ii
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
primary sbrt
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!