Background: Water irrigant is discouraged in ureteroscopy due to risks demonstrated in more invasive endoscopic procedures. However, water is not well studied in ureteroscopy and may provide better visualization than standard saline.

Objective: To determine whether water irrigant increases the risk of hyponatremia compared with saline and provides better visualization in ureteroscopy.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A randomized, prospective, double-blinded trial was conducted. In 2017, eligible adult ureteroscopy patients at a university hospital were recruited for the study.

Intervention: Participants randomized to water or saline irrigant in ureteroscopy.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: Serum sodium and osmolality, body temperature, subjective surgeon visualization, and objective turbidity clarity were analyzed. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance test for continuous variables were performed.

Results And Limitations: A total of 121 individuals (mean age 57 ± 15 yr) underwent ureteroscopy (mean time 35 ± 18 min) with a mean irrigation volume of 839 ± 608 ml. For the 101 (83%) patients who had nephrolithiasis, the mean number of stones was 2 ± 1 and the mean stone burden was 13 ± 7 mm. There were no significant differences in demographic, clinical, and intraoperative variables between water and saline groups, except for a higher body mass index in the saline group (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between groups in the incidence of hyponatremia, hypo-osmolality, or hypothermia. The median surgeon visualization score was significantly higher using water (p < 0.01). The mean turbidity was significantly lower with water (p = 0.02). Limitations were not objectively assessing hemolysis or fluid absorption.

Conclusions: Water irrigant does not increase the incidence of hyponatremia in uncomplicated ureteroscopy and provides clearer visualization than saline.

Patient Summary: We compared safety and clarity of water and saline irrigation, which aid surgeon visualization, in ureteroscopy, which can treat kidney stones. We found that water irrigant does not reduce blood sodium levels significantly compared with saline in ureteroscopy and provides better visualization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.02.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

water irrigant
16
better visualization
12
water saline
12
surgeon visualization
12
water
11
safety clarity
8
clarity water
8
saline irrigant
8
ureteroscopy
8
compared saline
8

Similar Publications

Lycium barbarum is an important economic crop in the arid region of Northwest China, and the regulation of irrigation and fertilisation is an important way to improve the quality and yield of Lycium barbarum. To explore the effects of water-fertiliser coupling on photosynthesis, quality and yield of Lycium barbarum under irrigation methods based on predicted crop evapotranspiration (ET), ET was calculated via reference evapotranspiration (ET) predicted on the basis of public weather forecasts, and the irrigation water volume was determined as a proportion of this ET. A field experiment was conducted via a completely randomised experimental design with five irrigation water volumes (W0 (100% ET), W1 (90% ET), W2 (80% ET), W3 (70% ET) and W4 (65% ET)) and three fertiliser application rates (high fertiliser (FH), medium fertiliser (FM) and low fertiliser (FL)).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Agriculture 4.0 technologies continue to see low adoption among small and medium-sized farmers, primarily because these solutions often fail to account for the specific challenges of rural areas. In this work, we propose and implement a design methodology to develop a Precision Agriculture solution aimed at assisting farmers in managing water stress in Hass avocado crops.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Drought limits crop growth and yield. Inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) emerges as a promising strategy to protect crops against drought. However, the number of drought-tolerant PGPR is limited, and the regulation mechanisms remain elusive.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The cultivation of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in semi-arid regions is affected by drought. To explore potential alleviation strategies, we investigated the impact of inoculation with Bacillus velezensis, and the application of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) via foliage application (FA), which promote plant growth and enhance stress tolerance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deficit irrigation differentially modulates rhizosphere microbial community and metabolites of two potato genotypes differing in drought tolerance.

J Environ Manage

December 2024

State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Tuber and Root Crop of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12, Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, PR China.

Beneficial interactions between plant root exudates and the rhizosphere microbial community can alleviate the adverse effects of environmental stress on crop yields, but these interactions remain poorly understood in potato growing in drying soil. We investigated the responses of rhizosphere soil microorganisms and metabolites, and biochemical and physiological responses of two potato genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance (drought tolerant 'C93' and drought sensitive 'Favorita'), to two different irrigation treatments imposing contrasting soil water availability in the field. Deficit irrigation altered rhizosphere soil bacterial communities and metabolites of C93 more than Favorita.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!