A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

High prevalence of intrapelvic parasitic arteries in patients with placenta accreta spectrum: A case-control study using unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography. | LitMetric

Purpose: To compare the prevalence of enlarged ovarian and intrapelvic parasitic arteries to the gravid uterus between cases of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and those with normal placentation using unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.

Methods: Unenhanced time-of-flight MR angiography was performed in 12 consecutive women with PAS (mean age, 34 years; range, 23-42 years) and 24 women with normal placentation (mean age, 31 years; range, 24-42 years) in their third trimester and reviewed by two independent observers. The consensus reading served as the reference standard. Findings of pelvic arteriography performed at cesarean hysterectomy were reviewed in all cases of PAS. The prevalence of enlarged ovarian and intrapelvic parasitic arteries was compared using Fisher's exact test. The interobserver agreement was assessed with Kappa statistics.

Results: The prevalence of enlarged ovarian arteries was not significantly different between cases of PAS and normal placentation (17% [4/24 pelvic sides] vs. 4% [2/48 pelvic sides], P = .091). The prevalence of intrapelvic parasitic arteries was significantly higher in cases of PAS than in those with normal placentation (67% [16/24 pelvic sides] vs. 0% [0/48 pelvic sides], P < .0001). On a patient-by-patient basis, the intrapelvic parasitic artery was frequently present in women with PAS (92% [11/12 patients]). The Kappa values were 0.915 and 0.852 for detecting enlarged ovarian and intrapelvic parasitic arteries, respectively, indicating excellent interobserver agreement.

Conclusions: The development of intrapelvic parasitic arteries was an anomalous phenomenon observed on unenhanced MR angiography in the majority of women with PAS but was not observed in those with normal placentation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.02.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intrapelvic parasitic
16
parasitic arteries
16
normal placentation
16
pelvic sides]
16
prevalence enlarged
12
enlarged ovarian
12
pas normal
12
cases pas
12
prevalence intrapelvic
8
placenta accreta
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!