A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes. | LitMetric

A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urogynecology, and Minimally Invasive Gynecology Unit (Drs. Orhan, Ozerkan, Kasapoglu, Aslan, and Uncu).

Published: February 2021

Study Objective: To describe a new modification of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy without using a mesh and report the 3-year outcomes.

Design: A prospective cohort study.

Setting: Minimally Invasive Gynecology Unit, Bursa Uludag University Hospital, Turkey.

Patients: Women who were diagnosed with ≥ stage 2 uterine prolapse.

Interventions: A laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy modification using a polyester fiber suture instead of a standard polypropylene mesh.

Measurements And Main Results: The primary outcome was the anatomic success of the repair, with success defined as objective parameters using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. The secondary outcomes were subjective outcomes, which were assessed using the quality-of-life scales. Forty-seven women who underwent the procedure were followed up for a minimum of 3 years. Forty-four of the 47 patients had stage 0 or 1 prolapse at the end of the second year, according to the primary outcomes. The anatomic success rate was 93.6%. In the secondary outcomes, 2 patients were not satisfied with their pelvic floor after the second year. The subjective cure rate was 95.7%. There was a statistically significant improvement in both pelvic organ prolapse quantification and quality-of-life scores in the third postoperative year. The mean operating time was 84.6 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 21.3 mL. There were no bladder or bowel complications in the perioperative or postoperative period.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy can be performed safely with this meshless modification in uterine prolapse as an alternative.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.02.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy
16
sacrohysteropexy modification
8
anatomic success
8
pelvic organ
8
organ prolapse
8
prolapse quantification
8
secondary outcomes
8
second year
8
outcomes
5
meshless practical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!