AI Article Synopsis

  • Negative life events can lead to mental illness, and the newly introduced Cumulative Lifetime Adversity Measure (CLAM) aims to assess the overall impact of various adverse events throughout a person's life.
  • This study focused on translating the CLAM into Danish and validating its effectiveness within a large Danish population cohort to better understand the prevalence of adverse life events.
  • Results showed a U-shaped relationship between lifetime adversity and emotional distress, revealing that both low and high levels of adversity were associated with lower emotional well-being, and the study also found fewer instances of violence and environmental stress in Denmark compared to the US.

Article Abstract

: Negative life events are a predictor for mental illness. However, most research has focused on selected domains, e.g. childhood or recent adversity. The Cumulative Lifetime Adversity Measure (CLAM), a newly introduced questionnaire not yet validated, examines cumulative effect of a range of events including number of exposure to the same event. This measure gives opportunity to collect detailed data on lifetime adversity in large cohort studies. : The aim of this study was translation of the CLAM into Danish and validation of the CLAM in a large general population cohort. Secondly, we aimed to describe the occurrence of adverse life events in a large representative sample of the general population in Denmark. : Translation and validation followed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) for formative models. Content and construct validity were evaluated including hypothesis testing of accumulated lifetime adversity having a U-shaped pattern with low levels of cumulated lifetime adversity as opposed to no or high levels being associated with lower emotional distress, functional impairment, and pain impairment. The field testing sample was the DanFunD cohort (n = 7493) randomly drawn in a Danish population and examined between 2012 and 2015. : Pilot interviews showed that the questions were confronting but not offensive, straight forward, and easy to answer. Acceptability was good. U-shaped patterns between accumulated lifetime adversity and the outcome measures were found. Quadratic term: Emotional distress (β(95%CI) 0.007(0.002;0.012), < 0.007), functional impairment (β(95%CI) -0.002(-0.003;-0.001), < 0.001), and pain impairment (β(95%CI) 0.004(0.002;0.006), = 0.001). Field testing provided basic numbers for adverse life events for the Danish general population, with a cumulated lifetime adversity mean (SD), 5.9 (3.7). Compared to the US there were lower rates of violence, social/environmental stress, and disaster. : The results from the original version were replicated, indicating high construct validity. Furthermore, content validity was good.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7034458PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1717824DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lifetime adversity
24
life events
12
general population
12
adverse life
8
cumulative lifetime
8
adversity measure
8
accumulated lifetime
8
emotional distress
8
adversity
7
lifetime
6

Similar Publications

Background: Stressors occurring over the lifespan (i.e., lifetime stressor exposure) are hypothesized to contribute to greater risk of cognitive decline and dementia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ample research has documented the potential of both negative and positive impacts secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic on global mental health in adults and families, but less work has focused on mothers who experience economic marginalization. This longitudinal study aims to assess the impact of positive changes from the pandemic on the association between COVID-related stressors and psychopathology before and after the start of the pandemic.

Methods: Seventy-five mothers from low income, economically marginalized backgrounds (mean age=30 years, 80 % Black) completed a pre-pandemic visit (T1;2015-2019) and an online survey (T2;2020-2021) mid-pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Threat sensitivity mediates the association between perceived safety and anxiety in adolescents from urban communities.

J Psychiatr Res

November 2024

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA; Translational Neuroscience Program, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA; Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The study explores the impact of violence exposure on anxiety and psychiatric disorders in adolescents, particularly focusing on how perceived safety and threat sensitivity may mediate these effects.
  • A sample of 54 adolescents completed an online survey, revealing that perceived safety is linked to lower anxiety and threat sensitivity, while violence exposure itself did not show a significant connection.
  • The results suggest that increasing perceived safety could protect against anxiety, with threat sensitivity serving as a key factor in this relationship, indicating a potential avenue for intervention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Using a large Queensland cohort, the research found that 10.1% of participants had been reported for child maltreatment, with 3.3% admitted and 4.8% presenting at emergency departments for CMDs.
  • * The results indicate that all forms of substantiated child maltreatment significantly correlated with increased risk for CMDs, particularly anxiety and depression, suggesting a need for better screening for maltreatment in hospital settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!