AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Measures of centrality in networks defined by means of matrix algebra, like PageRank-type centralities, have been used for over 70 years. Recently, new extensions of PageRank have been formulated and may include a personalization (or teleportation) vector. It is accepted that one of the key issues for any centrality measure formulation is to what extent someone can control its variability. In this paper, we compare the limits of variability of two centrality measures for complex networks that we call classic PageRank (PR) and biplex approach PageRank (BPR). Both centrality measures depend on the so-called damping parameterα that controls the quantity of teleportation. Our first result is that the intersection of the intervals of variation of both centrality measures is always a nonempty set. Our second result is that when α is lower that 0.48 (and, therefore, the ranking is highly affected by teleportation effects) then the upper limits of PR are more controllable than the upper limits of BPR; on the contrary, when α is greater than 0.5 (and we recall that the usual PageRank algorithm uses the value 0.85), then the upper limits of PR are less controllable than the upper limits of BPR, provided certain mild assumptions on the local structure of the graph. Regarding the lower limits of variability, we give a result for small values of α. We illustrate the results with some analytical networks and also with a real Facebook network.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5128567DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper limits
16
centrality measures
12
biplex approach
8
limits variability
8
limits controllable
8
controllable upper
8
limits bpr
8
limits
6
pagerank
5
centrality
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!