To investigate the efficacy and sustainability of drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). An investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized study enrolled 88 patients for treatment of ISR with DCB (n=47; mean age 68.3±9.6 years; 26 men) or uncoated balloon (n=41; mean age 67.6±10.2 years; 26 men) angioplasty ( identifier NCT01594684). Additionally, the protocol provided for an observational arm composed of patients from either randomized arm who experienced recurrent ISR ≥30 days after the index treatment. Redo treatment consisted of 2 DCBs sequentially inflated at the same location (double dose therapy). The majority of patients (66, 78%) had Rutherford category 3 ischemia. The mean lesion length was 140 mm; a third (27, 31%) were total occlusions. The primary endpoint was angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months evaluated by an independent core laboratory. Twenty-two patients (7 DCB +15 uncoated) were treated for recurrence with fully overlapping double DCB angioplasty. Six-month LLL was lower after DCB (0.34±1.12 mm) treatment than after angioplasty with an uncoated balloon (1.58±1.10 mm, p<0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 18 (49%) of 37 patients in the uncoated group, 6 (14%) of 43 patients in the single-dose DCB group (p=0.001), and no patients from the recurrent ISR group. At ~2 years after treatment, a remarkable number (14/27, 52%) of TLRs were recorded in the single-dose DCB group. Treatment with DCBs resulted in significantly less 6-month LLL and fewer TLRs up to 24 months than treatment with uncoated balloons. The double dose for treating recurrent ISR did not cause recognizable adverse events or require TLR up to 24 months.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602820907917 | DOI Listing |
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Department of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Background: Drug-coated balloons present a potentially advantageous therapeutic approach for managing coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, the comparative benefits of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) over uncoated balloons (UCBs) remain unclear.
Aims: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with PCBs and UCBs.
J Control Release
January 2025
MOE Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Synthesis and Functionalization, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; State Key Laboratory of Transvascular Implantation Devices, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China. Electronic address:
Restenosis, the re-narrowing of blood vessels after drug-coated balloons (DCBs), remains a major clinical issue. While rapamycin is the current clinical option for preventing restenosis due to its effectiveness and low toxicity, its delivery is limited by poor tissue absorption and rapid clearance, leading to suboptimal drug retention. Here, we developed the adhesive-polyelectrolyte-coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) particles using in-situ UV-triggered polymerization, encapsulating rapamycin.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Endovasc Ther
December 2024
Department of Vascular Surgery, First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Purpose: Previous studies have indicated mixed short-term outcomes between drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of infrapopliteal lesions. However, the long-term durability of DCB angioplasty remains uncertain. The objective of this study is to present the long-term outcomes of DCB angioplasty for infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrials
October 2024
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Background: In view of the conflicting results from previous studies, the benefit of paclitaxel-coated balloons for arteriovenous fistulas is uncertain and equipoise remains. Although an industry-led trial testing the efficacy of sirolimus-coated balloons in AVFs is in progress, the benefit of sirolimus-coated balloons for arteriovenous fistulas is currently unknown. The purpose of this trial is to compare the efficacy of additional paclitaxel-coated or sirolimus-coated balloons on outcomes after a plain balloon fistuloplasty to preserve the patency of arteriovenous fistulae used for haemodialysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Vasc Surg
October 2024
Bordeaux University Hospital Centre, Vascular Surgery Unit, Bordeaux, France.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!