Background: Primary objective of this review was to measure compliance with spectacle use in children with refractive errors. Secondary objective was to understand the reasons for non-compliance.

Methods: The databases searched were Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pubmed. All studies up to March, 2018 were included. The search terms were- ((((((Compliance [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherence [Title/Abstract]) OR Compliant [Title/Abstract]) OR Adherent [Title/Abstract])) AND (((Spectacle [Title/Abstract]) OR Spectacles [Title/Abstract]) OR Eye Glasses [Title/Abstract])) AND ((((Child [Title/Abstract]) OR Children [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescent [Title/Abstract]) OR Adolescents [Title/Abstract]). Two researchers independently searched the databases and initial screening obtained 33 articles. The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting and writing the systematic review. Two reviewers assessed data quality independently using the Quality Assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO). Poor quality studies were those, which had a score of less than 33% on the QATSO tool. Sensitivity analysis was done to determine if poor quality studies effected compliance. Galbraith plot was used to investigate statistical heterogeneity amongst studies. A random effects model was used to pool compliance.

Results: Twenty-three studies were included in the review, of which 20 were included in the quantitative analysis. All the studies were cross sectional. The overall compliance with spectacle use was 40.14% (95% CI- 32.78-47.50). The compliance varied from 9.84% (95% CI = 2.36-17.31) to 78.57% (95% CI = 68.96-88.18). The compliance derived in sensitivity analysis was 40.09%. Reasons for non-compliance were broken/lost spectacles, forgetfulness, and parental disapproval.

Conclusion: Appropriate remedial measures such as health education and strengthening vision care services will be required to address poor compliance with spectacle use among children.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038539PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01345-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

compliance spectacle
16
spectacle children
12
[title/abstract]
11
compliance
8
children refractive
8
systematic review
8
poor quality
8
quality studies
8
sensitivity analysis
8
studies
7

Similar Publications

Radiation Protection in the Orthopedics Department: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study.

Cureus

December 2024

Radiological Science Department, College of Applied Medical Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Objective: This study assesses radiation protection practices and knowledge among orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia using an online standardized and pre-tested questionnaire. The data were analyzed using statistical software.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Orbital defects can result from a myriad of underlying diseases and injuries. Treatment of malignant neoplasms and maxillofacial trauma are common reasons for orbital exenteration. Recently, a growing number of cases of orbital defects have been reported due to mucormycosis in patients with COVID-19.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Occupational Hazards, Associated Ocular Morbidities and Impact of Refractive Safety Eyewear among Agriculture Workers in India - A Two State Study.

Indian J Occup Environ Med

September 2024

Occupational Optometry Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Article Synopsis
  • - The study highlights the significant risks of eye injuries in agriculture, revealing a 9.4% prevalence of ocular injuries among 276 workers in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, India.
  • - It emphasizes the importance of safety eyewear, with 91.8% of participants reporting better visual comfort and reduced dust exposure when using protective glasses.
  • - The research involved three phases: visual task analysis, eye examinations, and compliance assessments, revealing that farming tasks are visually less demanding but carry hazards, necessitating better eye safety practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Corneal Endothelial Polymegathism and Pleomorphism Induced by Daily-Wear Soft Contact Lenses.

Cureus

November 2024

Neurology of Vision, Faculty of Optometry and Visual Sciences, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, SDN.

Background: Corneal endothelium is responsible for maintaining cornea transparency by pumping fluid out of the stroma to prevent the development of corneal edema which leads to blurring of vision.

Purpose: The study aims to investigate the corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in young myopic patients wearing disposable soft contact lenses (SLC) using a non-contact specular biomicroscope.

Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at Qassim University's optometry clinics from February to July 2024 in 100 healthy myopic patients, including 100 eyes wearing disposable soft contact lenses and 100 eyes wearing spectacle correction as control group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Contact lenses (CLs) are popular among users for correcting vision but there's often a lack of knowledge about their risks and proper care, prompting this study to assess awareness among CL wearers in Saudi Arabia.
  • The survey conducted with 393 women revealed that most learned about CLs from friends; the majority used them for social occasions, and dry eyes were a common side effect.
  • Regular CL use was notably low (16%), influenced primarily by medical and cosmetic reasons, with findings suggesting a need for further research on the safety and effects of CL wear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!