Introduction: To establish oncological safe nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, accurate assessment of extraprostatic extension (EPE) is critical. A recently developed nomogram including magnetic resonance imaging parameters accurately predicted side-specific EPE in the development cohort. The aim of this study is to assess this model's performance in an external patient population.

Patients And Methods: Model fit was assessed in a cohort of 550 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2014 to 2017 for prostate cancer. Model calibration was evaluated using calibration slopes. Discriminative ability was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Model updating was done by adjusting the linear predictor to minimize differences in expected and observed risk for EPE.

Results: A total of 792 prostate lobes were included for model validation. Discriminative ability expressed in terms of receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.78, 95%CI 0.75-0.82. Graphical evaluation of the calibration showed poor fit with a high disagreement between predicted probabilities and observed probabilities of EPE in the population. Model updating resulted in excellent agreement between mean predicted and observed probabilities. However, calibration plots showed substantial miscalibration; including both under- and overestimation.

Conclusion: External validation of the novel nomogram for the prediction of side specific EPE developed by Martini and co-workers showed good discriminative ability but poor calibration. After updating, substantial miscalibration was still present. Use of this nomogram for individualized risk predictions is therefore not recommended.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.12.028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

robot-assisted radical
12
radical prostatectomy
12
discriminative ability
12
external validation
8
nomogram prediction
8
extraprostatic extension
8
prostate cancer
8
receiver operating
8
operating characteristic
8
characteristic curve
8

Similar Publications

Clinical comparative study of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

BMC Surg

December 2024

Department of Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.

Background: A new era in minimally invasive surgery has been ushered in by Leonardo's robot surgical system, but the safety and effectiveness in cervical cancer is lake of evidence. This study aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RRH) and conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) in patients with cervical cancer.

Methods: Patients with cervical cancer who had radical surgery at the first affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January 2017 and June 2022 were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objective: A standardized intraoperative frozen section analysis of the prostate resection margin adjacent to the neurovascular bundle according to the NeuroSAFE technique is performed to maximize nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this review was to analyze oncological and functional outcomes of NeuroSAFE.

Methods: A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases until July 2024 was performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the treatment option for localized prostate cancer. It can lead to side effects like erectile dysfunction (ED) and post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI). This study aimed to evaluate association between dyadic adjustment, PPUI and ED.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The advantages and disadvantages of Robotic Laparoscopic Surgery (RLS) compared to other minimally invasive surgical approaches are debated in the literature.

Objective: To evaluate the learning curves (LC) and their assessment methods for Robotic Laparoscopic Surgery (RLS) and Laparoscopic Surgery (LPS) in gynaecologic procedures.

Materials And Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed including the English language observational or interventional studies reporting the absolute number of procedures needed to achieve competency in RLS and LPS gynaecologic procedures, along with an objective and reproducible LC assessment method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!