AI Article Synopsis

  • Surgical reoperation (Redo-AVR) vs. femoral minimally invasive valve-in-valve implantation (femTAVI-VIV) for degenerated aortic bioprostheses was the focus of this clinical study, comparing outcomes for the two methods.
  • The study reviewed 108 patients from 2003 to 2018, finding that femTAVI-VIV patients were older and at higher risk, but overall survival rates were comparable between the two procedures at various time points.
  • The transcatheter approach (femTAVI-VIV) showed benefits like shorter hospital stays and fewer transfusions, making it a safe alternative, especially for high-risk patients.

Article Abstract

Background: Surgical reoperation is still a standard procedure performed for degenerated aortic bioprostheses. On the other hand femoral minimally invasive valve-in-valve implantation (femTAVI-VIV) is an intriguing alternative. This clinical study was design to compare the early and late outcomes of redo-surgery (Redo-AVR) and femTAVI-VIV procedures for failed aortic bioprostheses.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 108 patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses qualified for isolated Redo-AVR (n = 40) or femTAVI-VIV (n = 68) between 2003 and 2018. Both cohorts were divided into intermediate and high-risk groups according to the EuroSCORE II (4-9% and >9%). Propensity score matching selected 20 pairs in Intermediate-risk group and 10 pairs in High-risk group for the final comparison.

Results: Patients qualified for femTAVI-VIV were older (79.2 vs 72.9 years, p < 0.001) and at higher risk (EuroSCORE II 10.9 vs 7.8%, p = 0.005) than Redo-AVR subjects. Overall survival in femTAVI-VIV and Redo-AVR was comparable at 30-days, 1- and 5-years, respectively (92.6% vs 92.5%, 85.2% vs 85.0% and 62.9% vs 72.5%, p = 0.287). After PSM no differences in mortality, myocardial infarction, pacemaker implantation, stroke or acute renal insufficiency were found. Transcatheter procedure was associated with shorter hospital stay, lower rate of blood products transfusions and higher incidence of mild paravalvular leaks.

Conclusion: Our study supports the opinion that transcatheter approach for treatment of patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses is a safe alternative to Redo-AVR procedures particularly for those at high-risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.02.035DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aortic bioprostheses
12
valve-in-valve implantation
8
failed aortic
8
degenerated aortic
8
femoral transcatheter
4
transcatheter valve-in-valve
4
implantation alternative
4
alternative strategy
4
strategy failed
4
aortic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!