A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of S-phase fractions measured by flow cytometry and autoradiography in human transplant tumors. | LitMetric

Comparison of S-phase fractions measured by flow cytometry and autoradiography in human transplant tumors.

Cytometry

Institute of Comparative and Experimental Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany.

Published: November 1988

The 3H-thymidine labeling index (TLI) and the percentage of cells in the S-phase have been determined by autoradiography and by flow cytometry, (FCM), respectively, in six malignant tumors of human origin transplanted on athymic nude mice. The Dean and Jett model and the graphical model were used to determine the percent of S-phase cells by FCM. Cell cycle analysis was performed using 1) no correction for background; 2) an algebraic function for background correction; and 3) an exponential function for background subtraction. Each of these three data sets was evaluated using both the Dean and Jett model and a graphical model for the evaluation of DNA histograms. The S-phase fractions (SPF) were compared to the corresponding labeling index results. SPF without background correction were 1.54 times higher than the TLI. SPF, after correction using the algebraic model, were 1.29-fold higher than the TLI, whereas SPF obtained after background subtraction according to the exponential model were only 1.05-fold higher than the TLI. Student's t-test revealed significant differences between the mean TLI values (16.25 +/- 9.06) and the mean SPF obtained by FCM without background correction (mean 25.0 +/- 9.36, P less than 0.01), but not between the mean TLI values and the mean SPF percentages after algebraic (mean 21.0 +/- 10.29) and exponential background correction (mean 17.11 +/- 11.59), P greater than 0.05 each. There was no difference between the results obtained using the Dean and Jett model and those obtained using the graphic evaluation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990090615DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

background correction
16
dean jett
12
jett model
12
higher tli
12
s-phase fractions
8
flow cytometry
8
model graphical
8
graphical model
8
function background
8
background subtraction
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!