Whole Brain Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Poor-Prognosis Patients with One to 10 Brain Metastases: A Randomised Feasibility Study.

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: July 2020

Aims: A significant proportion of patients with brain metastases have a poor prognosis, with a life expectancy of 3-6 months. To determine the optimal radiotherapeutic strategy for brain metastases in this population, we conducted a randomised feasibility study of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Materials And Methods: Patients with a life expectancy of 3-6 months and between one and 10 brain metastases with a diameter ≤4 cm were enrolled at six Canadian cancer centres. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either WBRT (20 Gy in five fractions) or SRS (15 Gy in one fraction). The primary end point was the rate of accrual per month. Secondary feasibility and clinical end points included the ratio of accrued subjects to screened subjects. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT02220491).

Results: In total, 210 patients were screened to enrol 22 patients into the trial; 20 patients were randomised between the two arms. Two patients did not receive treatment because one patient died and another patient withdrew consent after being enrolled. Patients were accrued between January 2015 and November 2017; the accrual rate was 0.63 patients/month. The most common reasons for exclusion were anticipated median survival outside the required range (n = 40), baseline Karnofsky Performance Score below 70 (n = 28) and more than 10 brain metastases (n = 28). The median follow-up was 7.0 months and the median survival was 7.0 months for all patients in the trial. The median intracranial progression-free survival was 1.8 months in the SRS arm and 9.2 months in the WBRT arm. There were five grade 3+ toxicities in the SRS arm and one grade 3+ toxicity in the WBRT arm; no grade 5 toxicities were observed. The cumulative rates of retreatment were 40% in the SRS arm and 40% in the WBRT arm.

Conclusions: A randomised trial evaluating WBRT versus SRS in patients with one to 10 metastases and a poor prognosis is feasible. A slower than expected accrual rate and difficulties with accurate prognostication were identified as issues in this feasibility study. A larger phase III randomised trial is planned to determine the optimal treatment in this patient population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2020.02.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brain metastases
20
feasibility study
12
srs arm
12
arm grade
12
patients
11
brain radiotherapy
8
versus stereotactic
8
stereotactic radiosurgery
8
patients brain
8
randomised feasibility
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with oligometastases is potentially curable by radical treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for thoracic disease, including the primary lesion and lymph node metastases, combined with local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligometastases.

Methods: This was a multicenter Phase II trial for patients with Stage IV NSCLC with oligometastases for whom CRT for thoracic disease was feasible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Osimertinib is the first-line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have EGFR mutations and favorable performance status (PS). Despite increasing clinical data on osimertinib, evidence in patients with an impaired PS remains limited. Therefore, a multicenter phase II trial (OPEN/TORG2040) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and poor PS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are common in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer, increasing morbidity and mortality. Systemic therapy for BMs can be effective, with the triple combination of trastuzumab, capecitabine, and tucatinib being a potential standard. More recently, intracranial activity of antibody-drug conjugates has been reported, but the size of individual studies has been small.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • CheckMate 204 study found that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in high intracranial objective response rates (icORRs) for patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs), prompting a need for standardized response criteria.
  • Different assessment criteria (like mRECIST and volumetric measurements) showed higher icORRs and stronger correlations with progression-free survival (icPFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to RANO-BM and RECIST.
  • The analysis suggests that mRECIST and volumetric criteria are reliable scales for future MBM trials, and response can be effectively measured even in patients with small lesions (<10 mm).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The SEER Registry contains U.S. cancer statistics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!