AI Article Synopsis

  • A study compared the efficacy and safety of 400 units (U) vs. 240 U of onabotulinumtoxinA for treating upper limb spasticity in post-stroke patients, focusing on muscle tone reduction and functional improvements.
  • Both doses were injected in the forearm, with the 400 U group receiving an additional injection in the elbow, leading to greater muscle tone reduction in that area while both groups showed similar outcomes for wrists and fingers.
  • The study confirmed that the 400 U dose is effective and well-tolerated, providing valuable data for the optimal use of onabotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice without new safety concerns identified.

Article Abstract

In many countries, 400 units (U) is the maximum dose of onabotulinumtoxinA available to treat upper limb spasticity, but few studies have demonstrated the optimal use of this dose. In the double-blind phase of this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of 400 vs. 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. Both groups received 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA injected in the forearm. An additional 160 U onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) or placebo (240 U group) was injected in the elbow flexors. Both groups showed similar muscle tone reduction in the wrist, fingers, and thumb; muscle tone reduction in the elbow flexors was greater in the group treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) compared to placebo (240 U group). Functional disabilities improved in both groups. No substantial difference was found in safety profiles. In the subsequent open-label phase, all participants received repeat injections of 400 U onabotulinumtoxinA (target muscles and doses per muscle determined by the physician). Similar efficacy and safety outcomes, as with the 400 U group in the double-blind phase, were confirmed. This final report demonstrates that injection of onabotulinumtoxinA 400 U relieves muscle tone in a wide range of areas and improves functional disabilities; generally, it was well-tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified. The dosing data in the open-label phase will inform optimal use of onabotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261167).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077183PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12020127DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

onabotulinumtoxina 400
16
efficacy safety
12
upper limb
12
limb spasticity
12
400 group
12
muscle tone
12
onabotulinumtoxina
9
0
8
400 units
8
patients post-stroke
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!