Introduction: We sought to evaluate the reproducibility of the motor unit number index (MUNIX) and MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MScan) when recording was performed over intrinsic hand muscles.

Methods: The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude, MUNIX, and MScan were measured from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), first dorsal interosseous (FDI), and abductor digit minimi (ADM) muscles from 15 healthy volunteers on three different occasions.

Results: The reproducibility of CMAP amplitudes was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.86 (APB), 0.90 (FDI), and 0.96 (ADM). Motor unit number index (ICC 0.73, ICC 0.85, ICC 0.85) and MScan (ICC 0.86, ICC 0.83, ICC 0.81) were highly reproducible across the three muscles. There were no significant correlations between MUNIX and MScan coefficients of variation (CV) and CMAP amplitude CVs.

Discussion: Reproducibility of MUNIX and MScan was not significantly different across the intrinsic hand muscles and was independent of CMAP amplitude variability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26839DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

motor unit
20
unit number
20
intrinsic hand
12
cmap amplitude
12
munix mscan
12
reproducibility motor
8
mscanfit motor
8
number estimation
8
hand muscles
8
icc 086
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!