Radiation Therapy Students as Partners in the Development of Alternative Approaches to Assessing Treatment Planning Skills.

Aim: The involvement of undergraduate students in assessment design is not a new concept. However, there is a paucity of evidence on radiation therapy students' participation in the design of teaching and learning activities. This article reports the development and initial evaluation of alternative approaches to assessing treatment planning skills and knowledge in undergraduate radiation therapy education.

Methods: A group of undergraduate radiation therapy students participated in a series of semistructured focus group meetings. The students nominated a practical examination and an oral plan critique assessment approach. The lecturers embedded two formative tasks to test the approaches in a second-year treatment planning subject. Two surveys assessed the experiences of the students, authenticity, engagement, and the practicality of the tasks in the treatment planning subject.

Results: The responses show that 92% of participants perceived the practical treatment planning examination as an authentic or real-world assessment approach. Moreover, 96% of the participants supported the notion of incorporating the tasks into the treatment planning subject. Most students (96%) perceived an oral critique of a treatment plan as an authentic approach and also supported the notion of incorporating oral critiques as an assessment task. Student engagement was high in both the practical and oral critique tasks, suggesting that lecturers could also include such tasks as formative activities to enhance learning.

Conclusion: Involving student voices in pedagogic assessment design positively influenced the development of new assessments for the treatment planning subject. The oral critiques and practical-based approaches nominated are likely to enhance authenticity to students' learning experiences and provide opportunities for students to develop desirable professional capabilities.