Controversies resulting from genetic testing on skeletal remains of disputed stewardship raise important questions about obligations inherent on genetic researchers to assure ethical chain of custody. In this article, we analyze and evaluate several proposed positions on whether such research should be published. Following jurisprudential standards for legitimate regulatory systems, we argue that responsible conduct of research requires reasonable attention to chain of custody but cannot require guarantees, particularly in cases of ancient remains.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.13110/humanbiology.91.1.01DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

responsible conduct
8
chain custody
8
atacama skeleton
4
skeleton advance
4
advance discussion
4
discussion responsible
4
conduct responsibilities
4
responsibilities controversies
4
controversies genetic
4
genetic testing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!