Clinical trials for rare neuromuscular diseases imply, among other investments, a high emotional burden for the whole disease community. Translation of data from preclinical studies to justify any clinical trial must be carefully pondered in order to minimize the risk of clinical trial withdrawal or failure. A rigorous distinction between proof-of-concept and preclinical efficacy studies using animal models is key to support the rationale of a clinical trial involving patients. This Review evaluates the experience accumulated by the TREAT-NMD Advisory Committee for Therapeutics, which provides detailed constructive feedback on clinical proposals for neuromuscular diseases submitted by researchers in both academia and industry, and emphasizes that a timely critical review of preclinical efficacy data from animal models, including biomarkers for specific diseases, combined with adherence to existing guidelines and standard protocols, can significantly help to de-risk clinical programs and prevent disappointments and costly engagement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044444PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.042903DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical trial
12
preclinical studies
8
treat-nmd advisory
8
advisory committee
8
committee therapeutics
8
neuromuscular diseases
8
preclinical efficacy
8
animal models
8
clinical
6
improving translatability
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!