A 5-year single-centre retrospective study of potential drug interactions in burns inpatients with psychiatric comorbidities.

Burns

Department of Plastic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom; Restore Burn and Scar Research, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Published: August 2020

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Introduction: Burns patients with psychiatric comorbidities may be at increased risk of harm from drug interactions. We aimed to identify the most common classes of drug involved, the potential clinical effects and any clinical evidence for their occurrence.

Methods: The International Burn Injury Database was used to identify all admission episodes for patients with a psychiatric comorbidity over a 5-year period at an adult regional burns unit. For this group, all drugs administered were categorised as either a new or continuing medication. Following this, an established online tool was used to screen for potential interactions between drugs. Where one was identified, a retrospective notes review was used to investigate whether it had occurred clinically.

Results: Ninety-one admission episodes were identified and records were available for 60 of these. In total, 145 incidences of severe potential interactions were identified (89 between a new drug and a continuing drug and 56 between two new drugs). The most frequently involved continuing drugs with the potential for interaction were neurotransmitter reuptake-inhibiting antidepressants and mirtazapine, while the most common new drugs identified were ondansetron, fentanyl and tramadol. The most frequently identified potential consequence of interactions were serotonin syndrome, arrhythmias and hypokalaemia. Clinically, there was minimal evidence for any interaction.

Conclusion: We have found many potential severe interactions in this patient group and psychotropic drugs were more commonly implicated than other drug classes. However, there was little evidence of the clinical manifestations of interaction. Serious drug interactions in burns patients are likely rare, but clinicians should be aware of the most likely drugs involved and the possible sequelae.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2020.01.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

drug interactions
12
interactions burns
8
psychiatric comorbidities
8
burns patients
8
patients psychiatric
8
admission episodes
8
potential interactions
8
drugs identified
8
potential
7
drug
7

Similar Publications

Diabetic foot, leg ulcers and decubitus ulcers affect millions of individuals worldwide leading to poor quality of life, pain and in several cases to limb amputations. Despite the global dimension of this clinical problem, limited progress has been made in developing more efficacious wound dressings, the design of which currently focusses on wound protection and control of its exudate volume. The present in vitro study systematically analysed seven types of clinically-available wound dressings made of different biomaterial composition and engineering.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rice blast, caused by Magnaporthe oryzae, is one of the most destructive fungal diseases in rice, resulting in major economic losses worldwide. Genetic and genomic studies have identified key genes and proteins, such as AvrPik variants and MAX proteins, that are crucial for the pathogen's virulence. These effector proteins interact with specific alleles of the Pik gene family on rice chromosome 11, modulating the host's immune response.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Analysis of Drug Molecules in Living Cells.

Crit Rev Anal Chem

January 2025

Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Cells are the fundamental units of life, comprising a highly concentrated and complex assembly of biomolecules that interact dynamic ally across spatial and temporal scales. Living cells are constantly undergoing dynamic processes, therefore, to understand the interactions between drug molecules and living cells is of paramount importance in the biomedical sciences and pharmaceutical development. Compared with traditional end-point assays and fixed cell analysis, analysis of drug molecules in living cells can provide more insight into the effects of drugs on cells in real-time and allowing for a better understanding of drug mechanisms and effects, which will contribute to the development of drug developing and testing and personalize medicine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions in Hematologic Malignancies.

Annu Rev Pathol

January 2025

Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; email:

Over the last two decades, there have been extensive efforts to develop small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) as novel therapeutics for cancer, including hematologic malignancies. Despite the numerous challenges associated with developing PPI inhibitors, a significant number of them have advanced to clinical studies in hematologic patients in recent years. The US Food and Drug Administration approval of the very first PPI inhibitor, venetoclax, demonstrated the real clinical value of blocking protein-protein interfaces.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Rifampin therapy is indicated for the treatment of staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who have undergone debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or one-stage revision as per the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guideline. Given the well-established effectiveness of rifampin as adjunctive therapy in staphylococcal PJI, it is crucial to evaluate its utilization in practice and identify factors that contribute to its underuse or incomplete administration, as these deviations may undermine treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.

Questions/purposes: Among patients who met clear indications for rifampin use having undergone DAIR or one-stage revision for staphylococcal PJI, (1) what proportion of patients did not receive it? (2) What proportion of patients started it but did not complete the planned course? (3) Where documented in the medical record, what were the common reasons for not using it or prematurely discontinuing it, and in what percentage of the patients' charts was no reason given? (4) What proportion of patients were taking a medication that put them at risk for a drug-drug interaction (DDI)?

Methods: Using an institutional database, patients who underwent DAIR or revision arthroplasty for PJI from January 2013 to April 2023 were identified (n = 935).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!