Since Wakefield et al. (1998), the public was exposed to mixed information surrounding the claim that measles-mumps-rubella vaccine causes autism. A persistent trend to delay the vaccination during 1998-2011 in the US was driven by children of college-educated mothers, suggesting that these mothers held biases against the vaccine influenced by the early unfounded claim. Consistent with confirmatory bias, exposures to negative information about the vaccine strengthened their biases more than exposures to positive information attenuated them. Positive online information, however, had strong impacts on vaccination decisions, suggesting that online dissemination of vaccine-safety information may help tackle the sticky misinformation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102284DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

confirmatory bias
8
bias health
4
health decisions
4
decisions evidence
4
evidence mmr-autism
4
mmr-autism controversy
4
controversy wakefield
4
wakefield 1998
4
1998 public
4
public exposed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!