Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is an important public health problem in the world and Turkey. The aim of this study was to evaluate the histological, virological, serological and biochemical response rates in CHB patients receiving tenofovir or entecavir therapy. Control liver biopsies were performed on patients who received tenofovir or entecavir therapy for one year or longer. Histopathological grading was scored according to the modified Knodell system. Eighty-seven CHB patients were included in this study, 56 patients were receiving tenofovir and 31 patients were receiving entecavir therapy. Patients in two treatment groups were similar in terms of baseline parameters (p> 0.05). At the end of the treatment, there was a significant decrease in mean values of HBV DNA, alanine aminotransferase and necroinflammatory scores for both groups (p<0.001); however, no statistically significant change was observed in fibrosis scores (p> 0.05). Histological responses were obtained 66.1% from the tenofovir group and 54.8% from the entecavir group. Treatment with tenofovir and entecavir resulted with improvement in Ishak fibrosis scores in 12.5% and 12.9% of the patients, respectively. For 14.3% of the tenofovir-treated patients and for 22.6% of the entecavir-treated patients, the Ishak fibrosis scores worsened. Baseline intermediate/ advanced fibrosis stage (Ishak fibrosis score: 3-6) was found as independent determinant factor on histological response and improvement of fibrosis score (OR= 3.99, p= 0.01; OR= 31.67, p= 0.002; respectively) and treatment duration longer than five years is an independent determinant for improvement of necroinflammatory score (OR= 5.79, p= 0.02). There was no significant difference in the virological, serological, biochemical and, histological responses and improvement of necroinflammatory and fibrosis scores between tenofovir and entecavir groups (p> 0.05). Similar histological, virological, serological and biochemical responses were obtained in patients with CHB receving tenofovir and entecavir treatments. Further studies involving a large number of patients receiving long-term therapy should be done to understand the effects of antiviral treatments on healing of liver histology.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.5578/mb.69122 | DOI Listing |
J Med Virol
February 2025
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, South Korea.
While entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) effectively manage chronic hepatitis B, their long-term effects on lipid metabolism and cardiovascular outcomes remain unclear. This study compares the impact of ETV, TDF, and treatment-naïve (control group) on hyperlipidemia and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in people living with chronic hepatitis B (PLWHB). We used claim data from the South Korean National Health Insurance Service.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJHEP Rep
February 2025
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheonsi Gyeonggido, Republic of Korea.
Background & Aims: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) lacks extensive research regarding its impact on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study evaluated and compared the effects of TAF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and entecavir (ETV) on HCC incidence using nationwide claim data.
Methods: In total, 75,816 patients with treatment-naïve HBV were included in the study and divided into TAF (n = 25,680), TDF (n = 26,954), and ETV (n = 23,182) groups after exclusions.
Viruses
December 2024
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Achieving HBsAg seroclearance is a key goal in treating chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection but remains difficult with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF), a recommended NA for managing chronic HBV infection (CHB), has uncertain effects on HBsAg levels and potential adverse events when used long-term after switching from entecavir (ETV). We retrospectively evaluated 77 CHB patients, including 47 who switched from ETV to TAF with a median follow-up of 40 months post-switch and a median of 60 months of HBsAg monitoring pre-switch.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To analyze the clinical effectiveness of Entecavir (ETV) and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Tablets for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
Methods: Clinical data from 100 CHB patients admitted to our hospital from April 2022 to April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 45 cases in the control group received ETV, and 55 cases in the research group received TDF tablets.
Am J Gastroenterol
January 2025
Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taiwan.
Objectives: There is limited information comparing the off-therapy relapse rates of patients discontinued tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) to those stopping entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).
Methods: A total of 805 HBeAg-negative patients without cirrhosis receiving entecavir (n=406), TDF (n=260) or TAF (n=139) were enrolled. Propensity-score (PS) matching method was applied to eliminate the significant differences in clinical characteristics.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!