Patient Safety: Patient Involvement Matters.

Healthc Q

A retired nurse educator and administrator. She has been involved in the past on several healthcare boards. She is currently the co chair of Patients for Patient Safety Canada (PFPSC) and has been a member of the program since 2013. Linda was involved with the National Consortium as a patient participant in the development of the Five Questions to Ask about Your Medications. She lives in Winnipeg with her husband Wayne. Her two children, their spouses and her grandchildren also live in Winnipeg.

Published: February 2020

As the co-chair of Patients for Patient Safety Canada (PFPSC), I have had the opportunity to be a guest editor for this Special Issue of Healthcare Quarterly and, consequently, have reviewed and critiqued each article. I also was a patient partner in the National Patient Safety Consortium, the work of which is the basis for the articles in this issue. Patient safety is a serious issue in Canada. In fact, unintended harm while receiving healthcare is the third leading cause of death in Canada (RiskAnalytica 2017). The papers in this issue describe initiatives that have the potential to and/or have contributed to reducing patient harm if implemented across our system and in such a way that patients and families are an integral part of the process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2020.26039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient safety
16
patient
7
safety patient
4
patient involvement
4
involvement matters
4
matters co-chair
4
co-chair patients
4
patients patient
4
safety canada
4
canada pfpsc
4

Similar Publications

Patient safety is the foundation of spine surgery, where the intricate nature of spinal procedures and the unique risks involved call for exceptional diligence and comprehensive protocols. In this high-stakes field, developing and implementing rigorous safety protocols is not only vital for minimizing complications but also for achieving the best possible outcomes and strengthening the confidence patients have in their care team. Each patient entrusts their well-being to their surgical team.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A systematic appraisal of the comparative efficacy and safety profiles of naso-intestinal tube versus gastric tube feeding in the context of enteral nutrition for mechanically ventilated (MV) patients is imperative. Such an evaluation is essential to inform clinical practice, ensuring that the chosen method of nutritional support is both optimal and safe for this patient population.

Methods: We executed an exhaustive search across PubMed et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the effect after the application of Failure Model and Effect Analysis (FMEA) in nursing care for patients who have undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Methods: A cohort of 40 patients who underwent ESD between July and September 2023 were selected as the control group, while 42 patients who underwent ESD between October 2023 and June 2024 after implementing FMEA were selected as the observation group. A multidisciplinary team was established based on the FMEA model to analyze and create a nursing flowchart.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Telehealth services are becoming increasingly popular at primary healthcare centres. Some examples include text-based digital triage and health guidance using chats, emails, images and pre-filled forms. Telephone-based communication has until recent years been the predominant means for triage and health guidance, but now includes written communication via computer or smartphone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Exploring the barriers to cervical screening and perspectives on new self-sampling methods amongst under-served groups.

BMC Health Serv Res

January 2025

NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Greater Manchester, England, UK.

Background: Cervical screening rates have fallen in recent years in the UK, representing a health inequity for some under-served groups. Self-sampling alternatives to cervical screening may be useful where certain barriers prohibit access to routine cervical screening. However, there is limited evidence on whether self-sampling methods address known barriers to cervical screening and subsequently increase uptake amongst under-screened groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!