Background: The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines for small solute clearance and fluid removal in peritoneal dialysis (PD) were published in 2005. The aim of this article is to update those guidelines by reviewing the literature that supported those guidelines and examining publications since then.
Methods: An extensive search of publications was performed through electronic databases and a hand search through reference lists from the existing guideline and selected articles.
Results: There have been no prospective intervention trials to inform the area of small solute clearance in PD since the publication of the original guideline in 2005. The trials to date are largely limited to a few prospective cohort studies and retrospective studies. These have, however, consistently demonstrated that residual renal function (RRF) is more often associated with patient outcome than peritoneal clearance. One of the few randomised controlled trials performed in this area does suggest that a weekly / of 2.27 ± 0.02 provides no statistically significant survival advantage over a weekly / of 1.80 ± 0.02. The lower limit of / is unknown but there is weak evidence to suggest that anuric people doing PD should have a weekly / of at least 1.7.
Conclusions: There continues to be very poor evidence in the area of small solute clearance and fluid removal in PD. The evidence that exists suggests that RRF is more important than peritoneal clearance and that there appears to be no survival advantage in aiming for a weekly / >1.70.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0896860819898307 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!