Background: Comprehensive analyses of battle-injured fatalities, incorporating a multidisciplinary process with a standardized lexicon, is necessary to elucidate opportunities for improvement (OFIs) to increase survivability.
Methods: A mortality review was conducted on United States Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities who died from September 11, 2001, to September 10, 2018. Fatalities were analyzed by demographics, operational posture, mechanism of injury, cause of death, mechanism of death (MOD), classification of death, and injury severity. Injury survivability was determined by a subject matter expert panel and compared with injury patterns among Department of Defense Trauma Registry survivors. Death preventability and OFI were determined for fatalities with potentially survivable or survivable (PS-S) injuries using tactical data and documented medical interventions.
Results: Of 369 United States Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities (median age, 29 years; male, 98.6%), most were killed in action (89.4%) and more than half died from injuries sustained during mounted operations (52.3%). The cause of death was blast injury (45.0%), gunshot wound (39.8%), and multiple/blunt force injury (15.2%). The leading MOD was catastrophic tissue destruction (73.7%). Most fatalities sustained nonsurvivable injuries (74.3%). For fatalities with PS-S injuries, most had hemorrhage as a component of MOD (88.4%); however, the MOD was multifactorial in the majority of these fatalities (58.9%). Only 5.4% of all fatalities and 21.1% of fatalities with PS-S injuries had comparable injury patterns among survivors. Accounting for tactical situation, a minority of deaths were potentially preventable (5.7%) and a few preventable (1.1%). Time to surgery (93.7%) and prehospital blood transfusion (89.5%) were the leading OFI for PS-S fatalities. Most fatalities with PS-S injuries requiring blood (83.5%) also had an additional prehospital OFI.
Conclusion: Comprehensive mortality reviews of battlefield fatalities can identify OFI in combat casualty care and prevention. Standardized lexicon is essential for translation to civilian trauma systems.
Level Of Evidence: Epidemiological, level IV.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002610 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A trauma expert consensus: Capabilities are required early to improve survivability from traumatic injury.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
August 2024
From the Joint Trauma System (J.M.G., R.S.K., S.J., B.J.S., J.W., H.M., A.J.R.), Defense Health Agency, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery (J.M.G., S.S., S.J., E.M.), Department of Military and Emergency Medicine (R.S.K., E.M.), and Department of Pathology (A.J.R., E.M.), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (J.B.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; The Geneva Foundation (A.M.S.), US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston; Department of Surgery, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (B.E.), University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Joint Medical Unit (M.S.), Joint Special Operations Command, United States Special Operations Command, Fort Liberty, North Carolina; San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium (M.S.), Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Defense Health Agency (S.J., S.S.), Colorado Trauma Medical Director, Colorado Springs, Colorado; Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (K.G.), Cooper University Medical Center, Camden, New Jersey; HNL Lab Medicine (E.M.), Allentown, Pennsylvania; and Armed Forces Medical Examiner System (W.W., A.J.R.), Defense Health Agency, Dover Air Force Base, Delaware.
Article Synopsis
- The study reviews US military fatalities from combat trauma between 2001 and 2021 to identify potential survival-benefitting interventions and improve trauma care systems.
- Out of 388 fatalities analyzed, 100 were identified as potentially survivable, with the majority occurring prehospital and involving severe injuries such as gunshot wounds.
- A panel of medical experts recommended 433 interventions, highlighting blood transfusion as the most critical prehospital intervention and thoracotomy as vital in hospital settings for improving survival outcomes.
Article Synopsis
- Aggregate statistics help compare mortality rates in U.S. combat operations, but individual-level data on factors affecting casualty mortality has been hard to gather historically.* -
- The DoD Trauma Registry provides valuable individual-level data from conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, allowing for detailed analyses of factors influencing combat casualty outcomes.* -
- To better understand combat fatalities and improve survival rates, the commentary suggests integrating data from the Trauma Mortality Review with traditional aggregate statistics, focusing on prevention strategies for injuries.*
Evaluation of Gender Disparity in Tactical Combat Casualty Care.
Mil Med
August 2024
Master of Public Health Program, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20314, USA.
Introduction: Women comprise nearly 19% of the U.S. military and now serve in almost all operational roles, increasing their risk of combat trauma and injuries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA Review of 75th Ranger Regiment Battle-Injured Fatalities Incurred During Combat Operations From 2001 to 2021.
Mil Med
July 2024
Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Introduction: The 75th Ranger Regiment is an elite U.S. military special operations unit that conducted over 20 years of sustained combat operations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnited States Special Operations Command fatality study of subcommands, units, and trends.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
August 2020
From the Defense Health Agency (R.S.K., E.L.M., J.T.H., J.C.J., H.R.M., F.K.B., J.M.G., S.A.S.), Joint Trauma System, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Military and Emergency Medicine (R.S.K., F.K.B.), Department of Pathology (E.L.M.), Department of Radiology (H.T.H.), Department of Surgery (J.M.G., S.A.S.), Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; College of Medicine (R.S.K.), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; Defense Health Agency (E.L.M., H.T.H.), Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Dover Air Force Base, Delaware; United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (J.M.G.), Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery (J.B.H.), University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Public Health (J.T.H.), Department of Surgery (B.J.E.), University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas.
Background: Death from injury occurs predominantly in prehospital settings. Injury prevention and prehospital care of military forces is the responsibility of combatant commanders. Medical examiner and trauma systems should routinely study fatalities and inform commanders of mortality trends.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!