Aim: This study was conducted to compare smear layer removal by five different irrigation techniques-conventional needle irrigation (CI), manual dynamic activation (MDA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), sonic irrigation (SI), and negative apical pressure (NAP).
Materials And Methods: Fifty freshly extracted mandibular first premolars were cleaned and shaped by One Curve rotary files and 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The samples were divided into five equal groups ( = 10), according to the final irrigation activation technique: Group I, CI; Group II, MDA; Group III, PUI; Group IV, SI; and Group V, NAP. The samples were prepared and observed under a scanning electron microscope. The photomicrographs were recorded and evaluated with a scoring system.
Results: Group I and Group II had the highest scores, which showed a statistically significant difference between the other groups ( < 0.05). This was followed by PUI, NAP, and SI.
Conclusion: Final irrigation activation with SI and NAP resulted in the better removal of smear layer when compared to that with other groups.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905312 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_267_19 | DOI Listing |
Clin Exp Dent Res
February 2025
School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
Objective: To assess the state of endodontic practices and identify factors influencing the use of modern endodontic techniques among dental practitioners in Croatia.
Materials And Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to all dental offices in Croatia, yielding 819 responses (27% response rate). Data were descriptively analyzed and statistically modeled.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent
November 2024
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, PDM Dental College and Research Institute, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India.
Aim: The purpose of the study is to evaluate how well the Endovac system and conventional needle irrigation work to remove smear layers (SR) from primary teeth root canals.
Materials And Methods: Fifty extracted human primary teeth were divided into two equal sections vertically, then positioned within an acrylic model that was secured with screws. Group A (Endovac), = 25, and group B (traditional needle), = 25.
Clin Oral Investig
January 2025
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of universal cements (UCs) to dentin prepared with different diamond burs using various adhesive strategies.
Materials And Methods: One-hundred-twenty molars were prepared to expose the mid-coronal dentin. The teeth were divided into two groups according to diamond bur preparations: coarse and super-fine grit burs.
Eur J Dent
December 2024
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on smear layer removal using a metallic needle and a new polymer needle (IrriFlex, Produits Dentaires SA "PD," Vevey, Switzerland).
Materials And Methods: One hundred and eight single-rooted teeth with one canal were randomly divided into four groups according to the preparation and irrigation needle used: G1-30, 0.04 and IrriFlex ( = 25); G2-25, 0.
J Dent
December 2024
Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. Electronic address:
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of multi-functional root canal irrigating solutions in the removal of canal wall smear layers, antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and tissue dissolution efficacy.
Methods: Forty single-rooted teeth were mechanically instrumented and irrigated with Triton, EndoJuice™, EDTA, and 0.9 % saline.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!