A systematical comparison of anti-angiogenesis and anti-cancer efficacy of ramucirumab, apatinib, regorafenib and cabozantinib in zebrafish model.

Aims: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world. Anti-angiogenic therapy is a useful strategy for the treatment of advanced GC. This study was aimed to systemically compare the anti-angiogenesis, anti-cancer efficacy, as well as the safety of four known anti-angiogenic drugs, namely ramucirumab, apatinib, regorafenib and cabozantinib.

Main Methods: Anti-angiogenic effect was evaluated for the intersegmental vessels (ISVs) and subintestinal veins (SIVs) formation in the Tg (fli-1: EGFP) zebrafish embryos. Anti-cancer efficacy was tested for the in vivo cell proliferation in cell line derived tumor xenograft (CDX) model based on Tg (fli-1: EGFP) zebrafish embryos.

Key Findings: All four drugs exhibited anti-angiogenic abilities and tumor inhibition effects in fli-1: EGFP transgenic zebrafish. Using zebrafish xenografted model, we found that effectiveness of ramucirumab in anti-GC-proliferation is better than apatinib, regorafenib and cabozantinib. The combination of anti-angiogenic drugs and cisplatin showed no significant benefit in tumors. Meanwhile, toxicity assay showed that all tested anti-angiogenic drugs could cause cardiovascular-related side effects. The therapeutic index (LD/ED) of cabozantinib is higher than apatinib and regorafenib, suggesting a potential as an anti-GC drug.

Significance: The comparison of GC-related anti-angiogenic drugs was first reported. It was found that cabozantinib had a potential as an anti-GC drug. Zebrafish model was an ideal animal model for the research of anti-angiogenic behaviors.