Numerical Analysis on Heat Transfer Characteristics of Supercritical CO in Heated Vertical Up-flow Tube.

Materials (Basel)

The Beijing Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow and Heat Transfer, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.

Published: February 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Understanding the heat transfer deterioration (HTD) and recovery (HTR) mechanisms of supercritical CO is crucial for designing heat exchangers and ensuring safe operations in the supercritical CO Brayton cycle.
  • A three-dimensional numerical simulation analyzed the heat transfer behavior in a heated vertical tube with specific dimensions, revealing key factors affecting HTD, including vapor-like film properties, turbulence intensity, and radial velocity distribution.
  • The study also examined how heat and mass flux impact wall temperature distribution, highlighting the significant role of turbulent kinetic energy due to buoyancy effects on both HTD and HTR, providing insights for optimizing heat exchanger design.

Article Abstract

It is great significance to understand the mechanism of heat transfer deterioration of supercritical CO for heat exchanger design and safe operation in the supercritical CO Brayton cycle. Three-dimensional steady-state numerical simulation was performed to investigate the behavior of supercritical CO heat transfer in heated vertical up-flow tube with inner diameter d = 10 mm and heated length L = 2000 mm. Based on the characteristics of inverted-annular film boiling at subcritical pressure, the heat transfer model of supercritical CO flowing in the heated vertical tube was established in this paper. The mechanisms of heat transfer deterioration (HTD) and heat transfer recovery (HTR) for supercritical CO were discussed. Numerical results demonstrate that HTD is affected by multiple factors, such as the thickness and property of vapor-like film near the wall, the turbulence intensity near the interface between liquid-like and vapor-like, and in the liquid-like core region as well as the distribution of radial velocity vector. Among the above factors, the change of turbulent kinetic energy caused by the buoyancy effect seems to be a more important contributor to HTD and HTR. Furthermore, the influences of heat flux and mass flux on the distribution of wall temperature were analyzed, respectively. The reasons for the difference in wall temperature at different heat fluxes and mass fluxes were explained by capturing detailed thermal physical properties and turbulence fields. The present investigation can provide valuable information for the design optimization and safe operation of a supercritical CO heat exchanger.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040844PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13030723DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

heat transfer
24
heated vertical
12
supercritical heat
12
heat
10
vertical up-flow
8
up-flow tube
8
transfer deterioration
8
heat exchanger
8
safe operation
8
operation supercritical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!