AI Article Synopsis

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show mixed results comparing verum (real) acupuncture and sham (placebo) acupuncture, often attributing similar outcomes to shared physiological responses rather than true differences in effectiveness.
  • The study explored the hypothesis that clinical outcomes of acupuncture treatments correlate with the overlap in dermatomes—the areas of skin corresponding to specific nerves—stimulated by both verum and sham acupuncture.
  • Analysis of 34 relevant studies indicated that higher overlap in stimulated dermatomes led to nearly identical treatment effects, while lower overlap resulted in significant differences, confirming the hypothesis regarding the importance of dermatomes in acupuncture efficacy.

Article Abstract

Background: Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture reveal no significant differences between acupuncture and so-called placebo acupuncture. There is a strong tendency to replace the term "placebo" by the term "sham," because any needling stimulates a certain physiological response. However, neither concept accounts for the great diversity of results in RCTs comparing verum acupuncture and sham (placebo) acupuncture. Some trials have shown little or no difference, while other studies have found statistically significant differences.

Objective: Verum acupuncture and sham (placebo) acupuncture may achieve similar results to the extent that they share active constituents. We identified these common active constituents as dermatomes: the segmental structure of the human body. In our study, we tested the hypothesis that the more verum and sham (placebo) acupuncture share the same dermatomes, the closer the clinical outcomes will be, and vice versa.

Methods: All major databases were searched for RCTs that tested acupuncture versus sham (placebo) acupuncture. The dermatome charts of Hansen and Schliack were used to verify verum and sham (placebo) needling locations. Reported clinical outcomes were assessed in relation to the percentage of overlap between the dermatomes stimulated by acupuncture and sham (placebo) acupuncture.

Results: Our literature search yielded a total of 1738 references. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The effects of sham (placebo) acupuncture varied according to the dermatomes stimulated: high overlap with those stimulated by verum acupuncture resulted in almost identical efficacy, while low overlap resulted in significant differences in efficacy. Clinical outcomes were similar when verum acupuncture and sham (placebo) acupuncture shared the same dermatomes (p < 0.01).

Discussion: The findings of this review confirm our hypothesis. Acupuncture studies that employed verum and sham locations on overlapping dermatomes helped to create a mediocre to negative picture of acupuncture's efficacy. The segmental structure of the body with its interconnected reflex system offers an additional neurophysiological explanation for the effectiveness of acupuncture applied to structures segmentally innervated by the spinal and visceral nervous system. Further comparative acupuncture studies should be based on knowledge of segmental anatomy. In testing verum acupuncture versus sham acupuncture, the chosen sham acupuncture needling locations should be situated on non-overlapping dermatomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0964528419889636DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sham placebo
36
placebo acupuncture
32
acupuncture
18
verum acupuncture
16
acupuncture sham
16
clinical outcomes
12
sham
10
placebo
10
acupuncture trials
8
active constituents
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!