A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Oncologic safety of immediate autologous fat grafting for reconstruction in breast-conserving surgery. | LitMetric

Oncologic safety of immediate autologous fat grafting for reconstruction in breast-conserving surgery.

Breast Cancer Res Treat

Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences: Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical School, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rua Ramiro 2350/600C, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil.

Published: April 2020

Importance: Autologous fat grafting (AFG), or lipofilling, has been used for immediate reconstruction at the time of breast-conserving surgery in order to achieve a satisfactory cosmetic outcome in patients with breast cancer and an unfavorable tumor-to-breast volume ratio or unfavorable tumor location. However, the oncologic safety of this technique is still unclear.

Objective: To determine whether AFG performed simultaneously with breast-conserving surgery is associated with differences in local relapse rates and disease-free survival.

Design: Matched retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Participants: Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with or without AFG between 2004 and 2016 were retrospectively enrolled and matched for age, staging, grade, tumor histology, and tumor immunohistochemical profile.

Main Outcome(s) And Measure(s): The cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and disease-free survival were the primary end points, while distant recurrence and overall survival were the secondary end points.

Results: A total of 320 patients were followed. Cases were matched with controls at a 1:4 ratio. There was no difference in LRR or distant recurrence of breast cancer between the two groups. The annual LRR rate was 0.86% in patients who received immediate AFG vs. 0.7% in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery alone (p ≥ 0.05). Number of lymph nodes was the sole independent risk factor for local recurrence (p = 0.045). No significant differences in disease-free survival rates were found between the groups.

Conclusions And Relevance: At a mean follow-up of 5 years, no significant differences in locoregional recurrence rates were found between patients who received immediate AFG and those who underwent breast-conserving surgery alone. These findings corroborate previous research demonstrating the oncological safety of immediate AFG reconstruction, further suggesting that this technique as a safe, effective way to achieve optimal cosmetic outcomes in primary breast cancer surgery without jeopardizing oncologic outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05554-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast-conserving surgery
24
breast cancer
12
oncologic safety
8
autologous fat
8
fat grafting
8
patients undergoing
8
undergoing breast-conserving
8
locoregional recurrence
8
disease-free survival
8
distant recurrence
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!