AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates surgical options for treating persistent macular holes, focusing on two methods: one using autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride gas, and the other using heavy silicone oil.
  • Results showed that the closure rate for the autologous platelet concentrate method was 57.1%, slightly higher than the 45.7% for the silicone oil method, with both methods yielding similar functional outcomes when successful.
  • The conclusion suggests that the autologous platelet concentrate combined with sulfur hexafluoride is a safe and effective alternative to heavy silicone oil for treating persistent macular holes, especially in cases where previous treatments have failed.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Persistence represents the major reason for failure of primary macular hole repair. A variety of surgical approaches are available for treating persistent macular holes. To compare clinical outcome of re-pars plana vitrectomy combined with autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% gas tamponade with heavy silicone oil in persistent macular hole.

Methods: Records of 48 consecutive eyes with persistent macular holes which underwent re-pars plana vitrectomy with either heavy silicone oil (35 eyes, persistent macular-hole minimum linear diameter: 518.8 ± 171.1 µm) or autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% (13 eyes, persistent macular hole-minimum linear diameter: 454.1 ± 211.3 µm) were reviewed retrospectively. All patients underwent measurements of anatomical persistent macular hole characteristics evaluated by optical coherence tomography and visual function. Cases in which anatomical success failed after first re-pars plana vitrectomy were treated with the other surgical techniques, comparable to a cross-over design.

Results: Persistent macular hole closure rate was 57.1% with autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% and 45.7% with heavy silicone oil ( = 0.102). Functional results were comparable when persistent macular hole closure was achieved ( ⩾ 0.741), but significantly better for the autologous platelet concentrate with sulfur hexafluoride 20% group when persistent macular hole closure failed ( = 0.019).

Conclusion: Re-pars plana vitrectomy combined with autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% seems to achieve at least non-inferior persistent macular hole closure rates and comparable functional results when compared to heavy silicone oil, suggesting autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% as a safe surgical alternative in persistent macular hole. Especially when persistent macular hole closure failed, autologous platelet concentrate with sulfur hexafluoride 20% seems to be superior regarding visual outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120672120903704DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

persistent macular
48
macular hole
36
autologous platelet
32
platelet concentrate
32
concentrate sulfur
28
sulfur hexafluoride
28
hexafluoride 20%
28
heavy silicone
20
silicone oil
20
hole closure
20

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!