Introduction: Two decades ago, single-incision surgery was established as a new concept in minimally invasive surgery. Single incision cholecystectomy is the most frequently performed procedure in clinical routine. Most of the results have been based on randomised trials. Large prospective multicentre observational datasets from clinical routine do not exist. This analysis of clinical health service research is based on the SILAP study (single-incision multiport/single port laparoscopic abdominal surgery study).
Patients And Methods: The data of the register were collected in 47 hospitals in the period of 2012 to 2014. Overall morbidity and mortality were the primary outcome. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: Data from 975 patients in clinical routine with single incision cholecystectomy were collected. Intraoperative complications were recorded in 3.2% of cases. Bile duct injuries were registered in 0.1% of cases. Postoperative complications were detected in 3.7% of cases. The mortality rate was 0.2%.The median operating time dropped from 60.0 to 51.5 min (p < 0.001) during the study. The use of an extra trocar was necessary in 10.3% of cases. Conversion to open surgery was performed in 0.7% of cases. Body mass index (p = 0.024), male gender (p = 0.012) and operating time (p < 0.001) had a significant effect on intraoperative complications in multivariate analysis. Classification of ASA III (p = 0.001) and modification or conversion of single incision technique (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with postoperative complications.
Conclusion: The register analysis of the prospective multicentre data shows that single incision cholecystectomy is feasible in clinical routine even outside the selective criteria of randomised studies. The only limitation is a BMI > 30 kg/m which has a significant influence on the intraoperative rate of complications in mild adverse events.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1071-8082 | DOI Listing |
J Vasc Surg
December 2024
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA. Electronic address:
Objective: The impact of great saphenous vein harvest technique on infrainguinal bypass outcomes remains a matter of debate, with no robust evidence favoring a specific technique over the other. This study aims to compare the outcomes of open vein harvest with endoscopic vein harvest in patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery.
Methods: Patients who underwent an infrainguinal bypass from a femoral origin using a single-segment great saphenous vein between 2011 and 2023 were identified in the Vascular Quality Initiative infrainguinal bypass module.
Breast J
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Asian J Endosc Surg
December 2024
Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Background: Robotic surgery may have shown advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery, but the da Vinci SP system, which utilizes a single incision, has had limited use in gastric cancer surgery. This study aims to evaluate the short-term outcomes of a novel hybrid technique, minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic surgery (MILAR), with the da Vinci SP system for gastric cancer.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 23 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the MILAR technique with the da Vinci SP system between May and October 2024.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics, Birth Center Wilhelmina Children Hospital, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Objective: Cesarean sections (CS) are among the most performed surgical procedures in the world. Small variations in surgical techniques could have a significant impact on a global scale, for example, in postoperative complications. In the present study we aimed to observe and audit every single step used during first time CS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFsurgery for rectal cancer often presents multiple tactical and technical challenges due to factors such as the tumor's extent, limited anatomical space, proximity to the anal sphincter complex, and the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. These factors can significantly increase the complexity of surgery and the risk of both immediate and delayed complications, which can occur intraoperatively or postoperatively. Objective: the aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the causes, diagnostic methods, and management of complications in patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!