To compare the Stretta procedure with proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD).From July 2018 to April 2019, patients diagnosed with NERD and referred for treatment were enrolled. They were treated with either Stretta procedure or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication and followed-up for 6 months. The symptom control, quality of life, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, 24-hour pH parameters, PPI usage and satisfaction rate were evaluated. The complications were assessed. The outcomes of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared.Twenty-eight patients in the Stretta group and 21 patients in the PPI group completed the 6-month follow-up. No severe adverse events occurred in both groups. Both interventions were effective in improvement of symptom and quality of life. The symptom score improvement was significantly superior in the Stretta group compared to the PPI group (6.3 ± 3.4 vs 8.5 ± 4.1, P = .03). LES pressure increased significantly in the Stretta group compared to the PPI group (14.2 ± 4.4 mm Hg vs 10.0 ± 4.0 mm Hg, P < .01). Although both interventions improved 24-hour pH parameters, including number of acid episodes (P = .27), acid exposure time (P = .39), and DeMeester score (P = .28), no difference was found between the 2 groups. Complete PPI cessation rate (82% vs 52%, P = .03) as well as satisfaction rate (89% vs 57%, P = .02) was much higher in Stretta group than those in the PPI groupThe Stretta procedure was safe and effective in the short term for the management of NERD. The Stretta procedure resulted in higher LES pressure and achieved better improvement of symptom control and PPI cessation than did PPI in the short term.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220108PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018610DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stretta procedure
12
proton pump
12
stretta group
12
ppi group
12
pump inhibitors
8
inhibitors treatment
8
treatment nonerosive
8
nonerosive reflux
8
reflux disease
8
6-month follow-up
8

Similar Publications

Background And Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects 10-30% of the population. Endoscopic anti-reflux therapies have been proposed for carefully selected patients. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of the lower esophageal sphincter (Stretta procedure) for the treatment of GERD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition that affects a significant portion of the Western population. Despite its benign pathophysiology, it has the potential to cause serious complications over time, ranging from conditions that are benign, premalignant, and/or malignant. Traditional treatment options include lifestyle measures, anti-secretory medications (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparative evaluation of endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy and stretta radiofrequency ablation in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: insights from a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Surg Endosc

August 2024

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cha Gangnam Medical Center, College of Medicine, Cha University, 566, Nonhyeon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Background: Treatment options for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) that is unresponsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain limited. Therefore, we compared the therapeutic effects of anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and Stretta radiofrequency (SRF) for intractable GERD in over 400 individuals who underwent either procedure.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study between 2016 and 2023 to evaluate the effectiveness of SRF and ARMS treatments for refractory GERD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Efficacy of different endoscopic treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

J Gastrointest Surg

July 2024

Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Disease, 900TH Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. Electronic address:

Background: There are no direct comparisons across different endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to evaluate the relative effects of different endoscopic therapies in GERD.

Methods: Five databases were searched until August 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (EBL), Stretta, endoscopic fundoplication (transoral incisionless fundoplication [TIF], endoscopic full-thickness plication [EFTP], and EndoCinch plication procedure [EndoCinch, CR BARD, Billerica, Mass.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and endoscopic anti-reflux ablation (ARMA) as a potential treatment for gastroesophageal reflux - preliminary report.

Pol Przegl Chir

October 2023

Department of General, Transplant, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, 1st Teaching Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Clinic of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is one of the most common disorders of the alimentary tract. Apart from troublesome symptoms, untreated GERD can lead to Barrett's esophagus and, as a consequence, esophageal adenocarcinoma. As for now, the most common treatment of GERD is PPI pharmacotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!