Aims: Accurate measurement of the glenoid version is important in performing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our aim was to evaluate the Ellipse method, which involves formally defining the vertical mid-point of the glenoid prior to measuring the glenoid version and comparing it with the 'classic' Friedman method.

Methods: This was a retrospective study which evaluated 100 CT scans for patients who underwent a primary TSA. The glenoid version was measured using the Friedman and Ellipse methods by two senior observers. Statistical analyses were performed using the paired -test for significance and the Bland-Altman plot for agreement.

Results: The mean glenoid version was -3.11° (-23.8° to 17.9°) using the Friedman method and -1.95° (-29.8° to 24.6°) using the Ellipse method (p = 0.002). In 16 patients the difference between methods was greater than 5°, which we considered to be clinically significant. There was poor agreement between methods with relatively large 95% limits of agreement. There was excellent inter-rater agreement between the observers for the Ellipse method and similarly, the intrarater agreement was excellent with a repeatability coefficient of 0.94.

Conclusion: We recommend the use of the Ellipse modification to define the mid glenoid point prior to measuring the glenoid version in patients undergoing TSA. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(2):232-238.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0726.R1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glenoid version
24
measuring glenoid
12
ellipse method
12
ellipse modification
8
friedman method
8
glenoid
8
prior measuring
8
agreement excellent
8
ellipse
6
version
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!