Commentary: Risk of overlapping surgery in cardiac surgery? Much ado about nothing.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex; CHI St Luke's Health-Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Tex. Electronic address:

Published: July 2021

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.054DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

commentary risk
4
risk overlapping
4
overlapping surgery
4
surgery cardiac
4
cardiac surgery?
4
surgery? ado
4
commentary
1
overlapping
1
surgery
1
cardiac
1

Similar Publications

Gambling advertising regulation in Ghana: what do we know and where to next?

J Public Health Policy

January 2025

Collaboration for Evidence Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

In Ghana and many other sub-Saharan African countries gambling advertising has become pervasive due to weak regulations that allow gambling operators to zealously promote their products as a risk-free way to make money. In this commentary, we provide a public health perspective based on document analysis of the Ghana Gaming Commission's guidelines on advertisements, and recommendations for strengthening Ghana's gambling regulatory environment. With the industry intensifying its focus on new markets to grow and sustain profits, and new global players entering Ghana's market, the competition for market share will most likely intensify with an associated and aggressive increase in gambling advertising.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In 2023, a breast cancer risk assessment and a subsequent positive test for the BRCA-2 genetic mutation brought me to the uncomfortable intersection of a longstanding career as an advocate for high-quality medical evidence to support shared patient-provider decision making and a new role as a high-risk patient. My search for studies of available risk-management options revealed that the most commonly recommended approach for women with a ⩾20% lifetime breast cancer risk, intensive screening including annual mammography and/or magnetic resonance imaging beginning at age 25-40 years, was supported only by cancer-detection statistics, with almost no evidence on patient-centered outcomes-mortality, physical and psychological morbidity, or quality of life-compared with standard screening or a surgical alternative, bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. In this commentary, I explore parallels between the use of the intensive screening protocol and another longstanding women's health recommendation based on limited evidence, the use of hormone therapy (HT) for postmenopausal chronic disease prevention, which was sharply curtailed after the publication of the groundbreaking Women's Health Initiative trial in 2002.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!