AI Article Synopsis

  • Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cancer trials are important for understanding treatment effects on symptoms and quality of life, but there is no agreed-upon method for analyzing them, which complicates result interpretation.
  • A consortium was created to establish recommendations for PRO analysis, focusing on research objectives, appropriate statistical methods, and how to handle missing data.
  • This Policy Review outlines these recommendations based on comprehensive literature reviews and collaboration among international experts, and it also discusses future developments in this area.

Article Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as symptoms, function, and other health-related quality-of-life aspects, are increasingly evaluated in cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to provide information about treatment risks, benefits, and tolerability. However, expert opinion and critical review of the literature showed no consensus on optimal methods of PRO analysis in cancer RCTs, hindering interpretation of results. The Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data Consortium was formed to establish PRO analysis recommendations. Four issues were prioritised: developing a taxonomy of research objectives that can be matched with appropriate statistical methods, identifying appropriate statistical methods for PRO analysis, standardising statistical terminology related to missing data, and determining appropriate ways to manage missing data. This Policy Review presents recommendations for PRO analysis developed through critical literature reviews and a structured collaborative process with diverse international stakeholders, which provides a foundation for endorsement; ongoing developments of these recommendations are also discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30790-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pro analysis
16
international standards
8
cancer randomised
8
randomised controlled
8
controlled trials
8
patient-reported outcomes
8
methods pro
8
appropriate statistical
8
statistical methods
8
missing data
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!