Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri.

World J Surg Oncol

Department of Bone and Soft Tumor, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 45000, People's Republic of China.

Published: January 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the mid- to long-term outcomes of two biological reconstruction methods (osteoarticular allograft and tumor bone inactivation and reimplantation) after resection of osteosarcoma from the proximal humerus in 13 patients.
  • Results showed that shoulder movement post-surgery was limited, with average ranges of 44° in abduction, 14° in flexion, and 12° in extension, and that fractures appeared more frequently in patients treated with tumor bone reimplantation.
  • Overall, complications included a higher fracture rate in the tumor bone reimplantation group compared to the allograft group, along with issues like caput humeri absorption affecting both methods during

Article Abstract

Background: The proximal humerus is one of the most common sites of primary or metastatic malignant tumors. Reconstruction of the shoulder after tumor resection is controversial and challenging. When intra-articular resection is performed, biological reconstruction (osteoarticular allograft and autologous bone implantation) may be the first choice rather than prosthetic reconstruction.

Objective: To observe the mid- to long-term effects of oncologic, reconstructive, and functional outcomes of two different biological reconstruction methods for resection of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 13 consecutive patients who underwent humeral reconstruction of osteosarcoma including caput humeri using osteoarticular allograft (n = 7) and tumor bone inactivated and reimplantation (TBIR, n = 6) in our clinic between 2007 and 2017. Patients' general information, resection and reconstruction techniques, oncological and functional outcomes, and complications were collected and evaluated. Different complications of implantations were compared and analyzed for the different biological methods.

Results: The study included ten males and three females with an average age of 19.15 years. The operation time was about 3.65 h with an average blood loss of 631 ml. The resection tumor bones were 13-45 cm (23.54 cm on average). The mean follow-up period was 5.27 years. The shoulder movement was 10-70° (average, 44.00°) in abduction, 0-30° (average, 14.17°) in flexion, and 0-20° (average, 11.90°) in extention at the last follow-up. The complications included fracture in four TBIR patients and two allograft patients with an average of 2.67 years postoperation. Fracture rate was higher and appeared time was earlier in TBIR patients than in allograft patients (p = 0.04); caput humeri absorption occurred in all seven allograft patients and three TBIR patients at an average of 3.10 years after surgery; severe graft bone resorption appeared in five TBIR patients and two allograft patients at an average of 2.57 years of follow-up.

Conclusions: Humerus biological reconstruction involving caput humeri was associated with a high complication rate and acceptable limb function in the mid to long term. New combined biological methods should be explored and adopted in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990589PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-1797-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biological reconstruction
16
caput humeri
16
tbir patients
16
allograft patients
16
involving caput
12
patients allograft
12
patients average
12
patients
9
average
9
mid- long-term
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!