Objective: To compare long-term outcomes in patients after carotid endarterectomy and those who refused surgical correction and received only conservative treatment.

Material And Methods: There were 1035 carotid endarterectomies performed at the Kemerovo Regional Clinical Hospital and Kemerovo Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary for the period 2014-2017. Surgery was refused by 136 patients for the same time. Thus, two groups of patients were formed: 1 - carotid endarterectomy group; 2 - conservative treatment group.

Inclusion Criteria: significant carotid stenosis, absence of severe neurological deficit (over 25 scores by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), absence of concomitant diseases limiting long-term follow-up.

Results: Lethal outcome (p=0.0038) and fatal acute cerebrovascular accident (p=0.0005) were significantly more common in the 2 group in long-term follow-up period. Thus, combined endpoint took the greatest values in patients who refused surgery compared with patients who received surgical treatment (p=0.0001). It should be noted that ischemic stroke de novo occurred in 9 (6.6%) patients of the 2 group after 10.8 ± 2.5 months. This complication required subsequent hospitalization for carotid endarterectomy.

Conclusion: Preventive role of carotid endarterectomy was convincingly proved in comparison with drug therapy regarding mortality and fatal ischemic stroke in patients with significant carotid stenoses within 2.5 years of follow-up period.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202001167DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carotid endarterectomy
12
conservative treatment
8
patients
8
carotid
8
patients carotid
8
kemerovo regional
8
regional clinical
8
follow-up period
8
ischemic stroke
8
[long-term surgical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!