Predicting Endovascular Treatment Outcomes in Acute Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion: A Model to Aid Patient Selection from the ASIAN KR Registry.

Radiology

From the Departments of Neurology (S.J.L., J.M.H., J.S.L.), Radiology (J.W.C.), and Biomedical Informatics (B.P.), Ajou University School of Medicine, and Office of Biostatistics, Ajou Research Institute for Innovative Medicine (J.H.P., B.P.), Ajou University Medical Center, 164 World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16499, Republic of Korea; Departments of Neurosurgery (D.H.K.), Radiology (D.H.K., Y.W.K., Y.S.K.), and Neurology (Y.W.K., Y.H.H.), School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; and Departments of Neurology (J.H.H., J.Y., S.I.S.) and Neurosurgery (C.H.K.), Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Published: March 2020

Background The decision to perform endovascular treatment (EVT) for stroke related to vertebrobasilar occlusion (VBO) remains controversial. Purpose To identify preprocedural predictors of good outcomes and to develop a model to aid patient selection for VBO. Materials and Methods For this retrospective study using a Korean multicenter registry, a predictive model for good outcomes (modified Rankin scale score, 0-2) was generated based on a derivation sample of patients with VBO (January 2011-February 2016). Preprocedural parameters, including onset-to-puncture time, infarct volume, occlusion type as a surrogate marker of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related occlusion or embolic occlusion (truncal-type occlusion vs branching site occlusion), and collateral status, were analyzed. Continuous variables were dichotomized based on receiver operating characteristic analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to generate a predictive model. The model was internally validated with the bootstrap method and was externally validated with a single-center sample (April 2016-December 2018). Results A predictive model was generated from 71 patients (mean age, 67 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 41 [58%] men) and was externally validated in 32 patients (mean age, 72 years ± 13; 19 [59%] men). The composite of initial DW imaging volume of less than 10 mL (odds ratio [OR], 19.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0, 126.4; = .002), onset-to-puncture time of less than 8 hours (OR, 8.7; 95% CI: 1.8, 42.0; = .007), and branching-site occlusion (OR, 6.1; 95% CI: 1.5, 26.0; = .01) could be used to predict good outcomes, with a median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.77-0.95; bootstrap optimism-corrected C statistic, 0.837) in the derivation sample and 0.78 (IQR, 0.62-0.95) in the validation sample. Results failed to show an association between collateral status and outcome ( = .67). Conclusion When selecting patients with vertebrobasilar occlusion for endovascular treatment, the combination of onset-to-puncture time of less than 8 hours, initial infarct volume of less than 10 mL, and presence of branching-site occlusions is indicative of a good outcome. © RSNA, 2020

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191227DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endovascular treatment
12
good outcomes
12
predictive model
12
onset-to-puncture time
12
occlusion
9
model aid
8
aid patient
8
patient selection
8
vertebrobasilar occlusion
8
derivation sample
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!