A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Accuracy of Type III Portable Monitors for Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea. | LitMetric

Accuracy of Type III Portable Monitors for Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Biomed Hub

Department of Clinical Investigation (Biostatistics), Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.

Published: June 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • * Results showed that type III PM devices had a much stronger correlation with PSG results (0.92) compared to type IV devices (0.69), particularly regarding the apnea index (AI).
  • * Despite the advantages of type III PM devices, they often underestimated the severity of OSA in patients with high apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scores, indicating the need for clinical evaluation alongside PM testing.

Article Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated whether the results from portable monitor (PM) devices for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), classified into type III and type IV devices by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, correlated with the results from polysomnography (PSG) testing.

Methods: Sixty-four patients with a sleep-breathing disorder used type III or type IV PM devices at home and were subsequently admitted for testing using PSG. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from each machine was measured, and the AHI component, apnea index (AI), and hypopnea index (HI) were also analyzed.

Results: There was a stronger correlation between the AHI values from PSG testing and those from the type III PM devices ( = 0.92, < 0.001) than for the data from type IV devices ( = 0.69, < 0.001). However, the correlation of HI values (type III: = 0.43, = 0.024; type IV: = 0.14, = 0.41) was poorer than that of the AI values (type III: = 0.95, < 0.001; type IV: = 0.68, < 0.001). Moreover, the type III PM devices tended to evaluate a patient's condition as less severe than did PSG testing when the AHI value was over 30.

Conclusions: Although type III PM devices outperformed type IV devices as substitutes for PSG, the clinical state must be evaluated for patients suspected of having obstructive sleep apnea.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6945970PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000489158DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

type iii
32
type devices
16
type
13
obstructive sleep
12
sleep apnea
12
iii devices
12
iii
8
devices
8
iii type
8
psg testing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!