Radiographic evaluations: Which are most effective to follow fracture healing?

Injury

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: May 2020

The assessment of fracture healing is an imperative and fundamental clinical aspect within orthopaedics. Despite that, there have historically been non-reliable methods utilized to assess for fracture union and nonunion. In recent years, a number of radiographic assessment tools such as the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST) and Radiographic Union Score for Hip fracture (RUSH) have been developed in order to improve the reliability of fracture assessment for union. These scores have not only increased the reliability of assessments but have also provided thresholds to aid in predicting nonunion as well as union. The nonunion risk determination (NURD) Score was also created to prognosticate these clinical presentations. With the large burdens of cost, lower quality of life and morbidity associated with fracture nonunion, these evaluation methods have provided orthopaedic surgeons with an improved ability to predict nonunion and assist in the management of patients. This review outlines the development, reliability testing as well as biomechanical validity testing associated with these scoring systems.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.12.028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

union nonunion
8
radiographic union
8
union score
8
fracture
6
union
5
nonunion
5
radiographic
4
radiographic evaluations
4
evaluations effective
4
effective follow
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: The lack of standardization in the assessment of healing potential of diaphyseal tibial fractures in the early stages of treatment leads to late diagnosis of non-union, which requires the development of prognostic diagnostic criteria that take into account possible risk factors.

Objective: To analyze and evaluate the available scoring systems for predicting union and non-union of diaphyseal tibial fractures.

Methods: We searched for publications in Scopus (Elsevier), PubMed, Publons, Medline, RSCI, Google, and Google Scholar databases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Senescence and osteogenic differentiation potential loss limited bone nonunion treatment effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). MiR-100-5p/Lysine(K)-specific demethylase 6B (KDM6B) can inhibit osteogenesis, but their effects on bone union remain unclear. This study aims to investigate the effects of miR-100-5p/KDM6B on osteogenic differentiation and bone defects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Although sesamoid-preserving procedures have been attempted to complement sesamoidectomy for hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion, few reports document the results. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients with hallux sesamoid fracture nonunion who underwent screw fixation with autogenous bone grafting.

Materials And Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent surgery between January 2013 and September 2022 were reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Although open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the gold standard treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, recent studies have advocated for nonoperative management, citing high rates of reoperation associated with operative intervention. However, no studies have compared nonoperative management to ORIF with dual-plate fixation, which may be associated with lower rates of reoperation compared to single-plate fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the complications and patient-reported outcomes of dual mini-fragment plate fixation to nonoperative management for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Outcomes for Younger Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures.

J Bone Joint Surg Am

December 2024

Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Background: There is a paucity of longer-term outcome data in younger adult patients who undergo fixation for an intracapsular hip fracture. The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcomes for young adult patients undergoing intracapsular hip fracture fixation and to assess factors associated with failure and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods: From 2008 to 2018, 112 consecutive patients ≤60 years of age (mean age, 48 years [range, 20 to 60 years]; 54% male) were retrospectively identified as having undergone fixation of an intracapsular hip fracture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!