Meta-analysis of modified Stoppa approach and ilioinguinal approach in anterior pelvic ring and acetabular fractures.

Background: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of the modified Stoppa approach (MSA) and ilioinguinal approach (IA) in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring and acetabular fractures.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane database for articles that compared MSA and IA in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring and acetabular fractures. All the included articles were evaluated by 2 trained reviewers in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook for potential risk. The Jadad decision algorithm and Downs and Black scores were also used to assess the quality of the included studies. The extracted data included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, reduction quality, clinical outcome, and complications.

Results: Five articles were included in this meta-analysis, with 186 patients in the MSA group and 219 patients in the IA group. Compared with IA, MSA significantly shortened the operative time (P = .0002), decreased intraoperative blood loss (P = .002), and provided better reduction quality (P = .03). Meanwhile, this meta-analysis suggests no significant difference between MSA and IA regarding clinical outcomes (P = .63) and complications (P = .34). The subgroup analysis of complications also showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (including infection, and vascular and nerve injuries).

Conclusion: According to this meta-analysis, the currently available evidence suggests that MSA can significantly shorten operative time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and provide better reduction quality than IA in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring and acetabular fractures. In addition, in terms of clinical outcomes and complications, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, meta-analysis.