Study Design: Case-control.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate fusion rates and compare a stand-alone cage construct with an anterior-plate construct in the setting revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for adjacent segment disease.
Summary Of Background Data: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion are considered the criterion standard of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy. One common consequence is adjacent segment disease. Treatment of adjacent segment disease is complicated by the previous surgical implants, which may make application of an additional anterior cervical plate difficult. Stand-alone cage constructs obviate the need for removal or revision of prior implants in the setting of adjacent segment disease.
Methods: All patients undergoing surgery for adjacent segment disease in a 2-year period were identified and separated into groups based on implant construct. A control group of patients undergoing primary, single-level ACDF were selected from during the same 2-year period. Demographic variables, fusion rate, and reoperation rate were compared between groups. Continuous variables were compared using Student t test, fusion, and revision rates were compared using Pearson χ test.
Results: Patients undergoing primary ACDF had lower age and American Society of Anesthesia score as well as shorter operative time. Fusion rate was higher for primary ACDF compared to all patients who underwent ACDF for adjacent segment disease (95% vs. 74%). When compared to primary ACDF, patients with a stand-alone cage construct had significantly lower fusion rate (69% vs. 95%) and higher reoperation rate (14% vs. 0%). There were no significant differences in anterior plate construct versus stand-alone cage construct in terms of fusion and reoperation.
Conclusion: Symptomatic adjacent segment disease can be managed surgically with either revision anterior plating or a stand-alone cage constructs, although our results raise questions regarding a difference in fusion rates that requires further investigation.
Level Of Evidence: 3.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003387 | DOI Listing |
PLoS One
December 2024
Department of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Background: In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation research, the choice of sequence influences the segmentation accuracy. This study introduces a method to compare sequences. By aligning sequences with specific segmentation objectives, we provide an example of a comparative analysis of various sequences for knee images.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlant Dis
December 2024
Northwest A&F University, College of Plant Protection and State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Yangling, Shaanxi, China;
Cereal cyst nematodes spp., are important pathogens of wheat (Toumi et al. 2018).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSpine (Phila Pa 1976)
December 2024
Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.
Study Design: A secondary analysis of data from the NORDSTEN-spinal stenosis trial (SST).
Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of adjacent segments decreases after decompressive surgery due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) up to 2 years postoperatively, and to investigate possible associations with baseline variables, including preoperative patient and radiological characteristics, and surgical method used.
Summary Of Background Data: Decompressive surgery for LSS is currently the most common spinal surgery procedure; however, there is limited knowledge on changes in the DSCA over time adjacent to a decompressed segment.
Global Spine J
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Objective: To confirm the effect of surgery on spinal column biomechanics and to provide theoretical support for the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical methods and their clinical efficacy.
Methods: 33 continuous patients with no significant difference in risk factors related to the mechanical complications were enrolled in this retrospective study. Sagittal parameters were measured in the pre-, post-operative and following-up lateral radiograph of spine.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!