Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin: A Review of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Versus Antifactor Xa.

AACN Adv Crit Care

Christine R. Parker is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Baylor University Medical Center, 3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, TX 75246, Vivek Kataria is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Published: December 2019

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2019771DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

monitoring unfractionated
4
unfractionated heparin
4
heparin review
4
review activated
4
activated partial
4
partial thromboplastin
4
thromboplastin time
4
time versus
4
versus antifactor
4
monitoring
1

Similar Publications

Introduction: No clear guidelines exist for unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring in adult patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) for refractory cardiogenic shock. In this study, we sought to compare outcomes between anti-factor Xa (FXa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) strategies for UFH monitoring during VA-ECLS.

Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective review of VA-ECLS patients who received UFH in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit between July 2019 and November 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Performance of Hemochron ACT-LR and ACT+ Test Cuvettes in Monitoring Low to Moderate Heparin Concentrations: An In Vitro Study.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

December 2024

Research Group of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Objectives: According to the manufacturer, the Hemochron ACT-LR cuvette is designated for heparin concentrations of 0 to 2.5 IU/mL, while the optimal concentration range for the ACT+ cartridge is 1 to 6 IU/mL. We hypothesized that at low to moderate heparin concentrations, the ACT-LR is more reliable than the ACT+.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Surgical procedures in anticoagulated patients require specific attention due to increased bleeding risk. Preoperative anticoagulation interruption in high-risk patients is often necessary. Bridging anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) minimizes thromboembolic risk, but its effect on international normalized ratio (INR) measurement is not well established, necessitating careful monitoring and individual assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Warfarin and heparin monitoring in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program

December 2024

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.

Anticoagulation is central to the management of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), an acquired thrombo-inflammatory disorder characterized by thrombosis (venous, arterial, or microvascular) or pregnancy morbidity, in association with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL; ie, 1 or more of lupus anticoagulant [LA], anticardiolipin, anti-beta-2- glycoprotein I, IgG, or IgM antibodies). The mainstay of anticoagulation in patients with thrombotic APS is warfarin or an alternative vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and, in certain situations, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH). Accurate assessment of anticoagulation intensity underpins optimal anticoagulant dosing for thrombus treatment or primary/secondary prevention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Troubleshooting heparin resistance.

Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program

December 2024

Departments of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Article Synopsis
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!