Uncommon fungi can cause opportunistic infections and are often unidentifiable using phenotypic methods. Molecular techniques, like DNA sequencing, may permit species-level identification but results may be challenging to interpret. To determine the clinical impact of molecular identification in this setting, we performed a retrospective review of fungal isolates referred for molecular identification. Seventy-five distinct fungal species were identified from 93 referred isolates, 31 (41%) of which are not known to be human pathogens. DNA sequencing prompted change in anti-infective therapy in only 3 (3.5%) cases but significantly delayed culture turnaround time (40 ± 31 vs. 30 ± 13 days, P < 0.001). Patient immune status and concurrent histologic or serologic testing significantly correlated with the proportion of pathogenic isolates recovered and patients treated (χ, P < 0.05). Molecular identification of uncommon fungal isolates should be limited to specialized clinical settings such as patients with immunosuppression and/or concurrent positive histology or fungal serology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114945DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

molecular identification
12
clinical impact
8
impact molecular
8
dna sequencing
8
molecular
4
identification
4
identification rare
4
rare yeasts
4
yeasts nonsporulating
4
nonsporulating molds
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!