A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Susceptibility-based MR Imaging of Nitinol Stent. | LitMetric

Conventional MR techniques have difficulty to accurately localize the stent position and access the stent restenosis because of the effects of susceptibility and radiofrequency (RF) shielding artifacts caused by stent mesh. Previous studies have demonstrated that a susceptibility-based positive contrast MR method exhibits excellent efficacy for visualizing MR compatible metal devices by taking advantage of their high magnetic susceptibility. However, the method is not evaluated in the visualization of stents. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to prospectively assess whether the susceptibility-based positive contrast method can be used to visualize the nitinol stents, with the comparison of two typical MR positive contrast techniques, i.e., susceptibility gradient mapping using the original resolution (SUMO) and the gradient echo acquisition for super-paramagnetic particles with positive contrast (GRASP). The experiment results showed that the susceptibility-based method provided better visualization and more precise localization of the stent than SUMO and GRASP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856775DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positive contrast
16
susceptibility-based positive
8
contrast method
8
stent
5
susceptibility-based
4
susceptibility-based imaging
4
imaging nitinol
4
nitinol stent
4
stent conventional
4
conventional techniques
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!